• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[临床医学模块化培训:全科医学学生教育的电子评估]

[Modular training in practical medicine: electronic evaluation of student education in general practice].

作者信息

Himmel W, Kühne I, Chenot J-F, Scheer N, Primas I, Sigle J

机构信息

Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 2004 Jul;66(7):457-61. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813345.

DOI:10.1055/s-2004-813345
PMID:15314738
Abstract

Effective from spring 2004, new regulations for undergraduate medical education in Germany require a two-week practical training in general practice. Similar to other forms of medical education, this practical training should be regularly evaluated by students. With regard to special conditions of the training, we preferred a web based evaluation. Since adequate models were not available, we designed, implemented and tested an electronic way of evaluation. The following aspects turned out to be of special importance: teamwork, time, data protection and cost. Meanwhile, the evaluation is established and still accessible as demo-version for visitors of the home page. This electronic evaluation of medical training in general practice is highly appropriate for a timely evaluation allowing us to obtain a comparison between students' expectations and actual experience as well as a continuous supervision and to provide feedback to the participating practices. This is an important step for quality assurance of medical education in practices inside and outside the university.

摘要

自2004年春季起,德国本科医学教育新规定要求进行为期两周的全科实践培训。与其他医学教育形式类似,这种实践培训应由学生定期进行评估。考虑到培训的特殊情况,我们倾向于采用基于网络的评估方式。由于没有合适的模型,我们设计、实施并测试了一种电子评估方式。以下几个方面显得尤为重要:团队合作、时间、数据保护和成本。同时,该评估已确立,主页访客仍可作为演示版本访问。这种全科医学培训的电子评估非常适合及时评估,使我们能够比较学生的期望与实际体验,进行持续监督,并向参与培训的诊所提供反馈。这是大学内外诊所医学教育质量保证的重要一步。

相似文献

1
[Modular training in practical medicine: electronic evaluation of student education in general practice].[临床医学模块化培训:全科医学学生教育的电子评估]
Gesundheitswesen. 2004 Jul;66(7):457-61. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813345.
2
Reflective teaching of medical communication skills with DiViDU: assessing the level of student reflection on recorded consultations with simulated patients.使用DiViDU进行医学沟通技能的反思性教学:评估学生对与模拟患者的会诊记录的反思水平。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Feb;74(2):142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.10.009. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
3
Evaluation of different delivery modes of an interactive e-learning programme for teaching cultural diversity.评估用于教授文化多样性的交互式电子学习课程的不同交付模式。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jan;74(1):5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.056. Epub 2008 Oct 23.
4
Evaluation of an interactive case simulation system in dermatology and venereology for medical students.医学生皮肤病与性病学交互式病例模拟系统评估
BMC Med Educ. 2006 Aug 14;6:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-40.
5
Evaluation of an educational programme in Ege University, Turkey: medical student's home visits with midwife preceptors.土耳其伊兹密尔埃杰大学一项教育项目的评估:医学生在助产士带教下进行家访。
Midwifery. 2008 Jun;24(2):226-37. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2006.12.003. Epub 2007 Feb 22.
6
Evaluation of a web-based family medicine case library for self-directed learning in a third-year clerkship.基于网络的家庭医学案例库在三年级临床实习自主学习中的评估。
Fam Med. 2010 Jul-Aug;42(7):496-500.
7
Virtual patients for assessing medical students--important aspects when considering the introduction of a new assessment format.用于评估医学生的虚拟患者——在考虑引入新评估形式时的重要方面。
Med Teach. 2008 Feb;30(1):17-24. doi: 10.1080/01421590701758616.
8
[Training in sports medicine for medical students--Evaluation of a practice-oriented teaching concept].医学生运动医学培训——一种以实践为导向的教学理念评估
Sportverletz Sportschaden. 2006 Sep;20(3):117-22. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-927002.
9
IVIMEDS: a short report on an evaluation of the cardiovascular system learning module.IVIMEDS:关于心血管系统学习模块评估的简短报告
Med Teach. 2007 Nov;29(9):961-5. doi: 10.1080/01421590701765561.
10
Teaching the quality improvement process to junior medical students: the Nebraska experience.
Fam Med. 2002 Jun;34(6):421-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Student evaluation of a primary care clerkship: quality assurance and identification of potential for improvement.医学生对基层医疗实习的评价:质量保证与改进潜力识别
BMC Med Educ. 2009 Apr 15;9:17. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-9-17.