Suppr超能文献

1981 - 2000年斯堪的纳维亚半岛的麻醉学研究:在欧盟及全球背景下的知名度与影响力

Scandinavian research in anaesthesiology 1981-2000: visibility and impact in EU and world context.

作者信息

Skram U, Larsen B, Ingwersen P, Viby-Mogensen J

机构信息

Academic Department of Anaesthesia, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004 Sep;48(8):1006-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00447.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We wished to assess the development in number and impact of publications in anaesthesiology and intensive care medicine from 1981 to 2000 in the four Scandinavian countries: Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark. For comparison, we also analyzed data from the UK and the Netherlands.

METHODS

Publication and citation data from 1981 to 2000 were gathered from National Science Indicators (2001), covering 33 journals indexed in Current Contents. Data were analyzed in running 5-year periods. The following informetric indicators were used: absolute number of publications; absolute number of citations; absolute citation impact (average number of citations per publication per 5-year period); citation impact relative to the European Union and the world; and the percentage of cited papers from each country.

RESULTS

The annual number of publications from Denmark was stable over the 20-year period. Sweden increased its production by 35%, while the remaining four countries showed increases from 100% to 146%. Thus, Sweden and Denmark lost visibility within the European Union (EU) and in world context. The EU and world citation shares of Finland and Norway increased slightly, whereas those of Sweden, Denmark, the UK, and the Netherlands all declined significantly. The absolute citation impact (ACI) increased for all the four Scandinavian countries. The ACI of the Netherlands did not change and was surpassed by all the Scandinavian countries by 1994-98, while the UK finished below the other five countries.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) The annual number of publications from Sweden, Norway, Finland, the UK, and the Netherlands increased after the late eighties, whereas the net publication output from Denmark was stagnant over the 20-year period investigated; (2) the international publication and citation visibility of Finland and Norway increased slightly, as opposed to the significant decrease seen by the other four countries; (3) judging from the increase in absolute and relative citation impact and in the percentage of cited papers, the recognition of publications from the four Scandinavian countries increased over the past 20 years.

摘要

背景

我们希望评估1981年至2000年期间,瑞典、挪威、芬兰和丹麦这四个斯堪的纳维亚国家在麻醉学和重症医学领域的出版物数量及影响力的发展情况。为作比较,我们还分析了来自英国和荷兰的数据。

方法

1981年至2000年的出版物及引用数据取自《国家科学指标》(2001年),涵盖《现刊目次》中索引的33种期刊。数据按连续的5年时间段进行分析。使用了以下文献计量指标:出版物绝对数量;引用绝对数量;绝对引用影响力(每5年期间每份出版物的平均引用次数);相对于欧盟和世界的引用影响力;以及每个国家被引用论文的百分比。

结果

丹麦在20年期间的年出版物数量保持稳定。瑞典的产量增长了35%,而其余四个国家的增幅在100%至146%之间。因此,瑞典和丹麦在欧盟及世界范围内的知名度有所下降。芬兰和挪威在欧盟及世界的引用份额略有增加,而瑞典、丹麦、英国和荷兰的份额均大幅下降。所有四个斯堪的纳维亚国家的绝对引用影响力(ACI)均有所增加。荷兰的ACI没有变化,到1994 - 1998年被所有斯堪的纳维亚国家超越,而英国的排名低于其他五个国家。

结论

(1)瑞典、挪威、芬兰、英国和荷兰在八十年代后期之后年出版物数量增加,而在调查的20年期间丹麦的净出版物产出停滞不前;(2)芬兰和挪威的国际出版物及引用知名度略有增加,而其他四个国家则显著下降;(3)从绝对和相对引用影响力以及被引用论文百分比的增加来看,在过去20年里,四个斯堪的纳维亚国家的出版物认可度有所提高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验