• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绘制 2016-2020 年期间的北欧研究全景图：对研究成果、合作和影响的综合研究。

Mapping the Nordic Research Landscape for the period 2016-2020: a comprehensive study of research outcomes, collaborations, and impact.

机构信息

Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.

Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2024 Jul 29;13:71. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.144036.2. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.144036.2
PMID:39262837
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11387935/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This article aims to study the research outcomes of five Nordic countries in terms of research publications, spend on R&D, outcomes and collaborations as these are important parameters to understand research thrust of the countries/regions, in addition to their innovation capability.

METHODS

The research outcomes of the Nordic countries in terms of the total number of publications, coauthored publications, publications with corporate collaborators, citations, the Field Weighted Citation Index (FWCI) and publications in different subject areas were retrieved using Scopus and its associate SciVal. The research outcomes were extracted for five years from 2016-2020. In addition, total population, researcher population and research spend of these countries have been obtained from World Bank data available for the year 2021.

RESULTS

The analysis showed that Sweden has the highest population and the highest number of researchers in this region. All countries have the highest number of coauthored publications with the United States, followed by the United Kingdom, except Iceland, which has the second highest number of coauthored publications with Sweden. Denmark, followed by Iceland, stands prominent with reference to having publications with corporate collaborations. Denmark and Sweden have a high percentage of articles in first quartile journals, which is above the average for Nordic countries. Iceland stands at the top with the highest citations, which is depicted by high FWCI. Across subject areas, the Nordic countries have maximum publications in life sciences. Other prominent subject areas include technology and natural sciences.

CONCLUSION

On analysing the research landscape of Nordic countries, maximum research output is in the field of life sciences and medicine, and most of the coauthored publications of these countries are with the United States. Denmark, with its exemplary research output, excels with maximum papers in top quartile journals and with maximum corporate collaborations and the highest FWCI.

摘要

背景

本文旨在研究北欧五国在研究出版物、研发投入、成果和合作方面的研究成果，因为这些是了解国家/地区研究重点的重要参数，除此之外，还可以了解其创新能力。

方法

本文使用 Scopus 及其关联的 SciVal 检索了北欧五国在总出版物数量、合作出版物数量、有企业合作者的出版物、引文、领域加权引文影响指数（FWCI）和不同学科领域出版物方面的研究成果。这些研究成果是从 2016 年到 2020 年的五年中提取的。此外，还从世界银行 2021 年的数据中获取了这些国家的总人口、研究人员人口和研究支出。

结果

分析表明，瑞典在该地区拥有最多的人口和最多的研究人员。所有国家与美国合著的出版物数量最多，其次是英国，除了冰岛，它与瑞典合著的出版物数量第二多。丹麦，其次是冰岛，在与企业合作出版方面表现出色。丹麦和瑞典在第一四分位数期刊上发表的文章比例很高，高于北欧国家的平均水平。冰岛的引文最高，FWCI 也最高，位居榜首。在所有学科领域，北欧国家在生命科学领域的出版物最多。其他突出的学科领域包括技术和自然科学。

结论

通过分析北欧国家的研究格局，最大的研究成果是在生命科学和医学领域，这些国家的大部分合作出版物都是与美国合作的。丹麦以其出色的研究成果脱颖而出，在顶尖期刊上发表的论文数量最多，与企业的合作最多，FWCI 也最高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/cfa5eef84bb5/f1000research-13-169327-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/05eb59d21ba9/f1000research-13-169327-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/d7412e7b204e/f1000research-13-169327-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/c37e220ccb53/f1000research-13-169327-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/88b39ff161bd/f1000research-13-169327-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/7846b0f800ce/f1000research-13-169327-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/af081589639b/f1000research-13-169327-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/48bd384688f4/f1000research-13-169327-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/1ac817cf6110/f1000research-13-169327-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/7e23c397fa6c/f1000research-13-169327-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/953ace956f72/f1000research-13-169327-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/cfa5eef84bb5/f1000research-13-169327-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/05eb59d21ba9/f1000research-13-169327-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/d7412e7b204e/f1000research-13-169327-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/c37e220ccb53/f1000research-13-169327-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/88b39ff161bd/f1000research-13-169327-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/7846b0f800ce/f1000research-13-169327-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/af081589639b/f1000research-13-169327-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/48bd384688f4/f1000research-13-169327-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/1ac817cf6110/f1000research-13-169327-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/7e23c397fa6c/f1000research-13-169327-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/953ace956f72/f1000research-13-169327-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fc/11387939/cfa5eef84bb5/f1000research-13-169327-g0010.jpg

相似文献

1
Mapping the Nordic Research Landscape for the period 2016-2020: a comprehensive study of research outcomes, collaborations, and impact.绘制 2016-2020 年期间的北欧研究全景图：对研究成果、合作和影响的综合研究。
F1000Res. 2024 Jul 29;13:71. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.144036.2. eCollection 2024.
2
Publication analysis in Bay for Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation Nations.孟加拉湾多部门技术和经济合作倡议国家的出版物分析。
F1000Res. 2021 Jun 28;10:510. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.52286.1. eCollection 2021.
3
Scandinavian research in anaesthesiology 1981-2000: visibility and impact in EU and world context.1981 - 2000年斯堪的纳维亚半岛的麻醉学研究：在欧盟及全球背景下的知名度与影响力
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004 Sep;48(8):1006-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00447.x.
4
A bibliometric analysis of publication output in selected South American countries.对选定南美洲国家出版物产出的文献计量分析。
F1000Res. 2023 Sep 28;12:1239. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.134574.1. eCollection 2023.
5
Macular disease research in the United Kingdom 2011-2014: a bibliometric analysis of outputs, performance and coverage.2011 - 2014年英国黄斑疾病研究：产出、绩效与覆盖范围的文献计量分析
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Dec 30;8:833. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1825-1.
6
Bibliometric analysis of literature on female genital mutilation: (1930 - 2015).女性生殖器切割文献的文献计量分析：（1930 - 2015年）
Reprod Health. 2016 Oct 10;13(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0243-8.
7
Bibliometric analysis of endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism research in South Asia from (2012-2021): Comparison with five developed countries.南亚内分泌学、糖尿病和代谢研究的文献计量学分析（2012-2021）：与五个发达国家的比较。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2023 Apr;17(4):102760. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2023.102760. Epub 2023 Apr 9.
8
Worldwide research productivity in the field of rheumatology from 1996 to 2010: a bibliometric analysis.1996 年至 2010 年风湿学领域的全球研究成果：文献计量分析。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013 Sep;52(9):1630-4. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket008. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
9
Trauma research in the Nordic countries, 1995-2018 - a systematic review.北欧国家 1995-2018 年创伤研究 - 系统评价。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Mar 12;28(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-0703-6.
10
Global Trends in LADA Type Diabetes Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications from Web of Science and Scopus, 1994-2024.全球 LADA 型糖尿病研究趋势：基于 Web of Science 和 Scopus 数据库 1994-2024 年文献的计量分析。
J Diabetes Res. 2024 Oct 14;2024:4960075. doi: 10.1155/2024/4960075. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: A country-level comparative analysis.引文游戏引发的文献计量评估：国家层面的比较分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 11;14(9):e0221212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221212. eCollection 2019.
2
Occupational Safety and Health Among Young Workers in the Nordic Countries: A Systematic Literature Review.北欧国家青年工人的职业安全与健康：一项系统文献综述。
Saf Health Work. 2019 Mar;10(1):3-20. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
3
Bibliometric analysis of regional Latin America's scientific output in Public Health through SCImago Journal & Country Rank.
通过Scimago期刊与国家排名对拉丁美洲地区公共卫生领域科研产出的文献计量分析。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jun 21;14:632. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-632.
4
Dermatologic research in the Nordic countries 1989-2008--a bibliometric study.北欧国家的皮肤病学研究 1989-2008--文献计量研究。
Int J Dermatol. 2010 Nov;49(11):1276-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04508.x.
5
The Nordic countries as a cohort for pharmacoepidemiological research.北欧国家作为药物流行病学研究的队列。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010 Feb;106(2):86-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2009.00494.x. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
6
How to use bibliometric methods in evaluation of scientific research? An example from Finnish schizophrenia research.如何在科研评估中运用文献计量学方法？以芬兰精神分裂症研究为例。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2008;62(2):136-43. doi: 10.1080/08039480801961667.
7
A bibliometric overview of public health research in Europe.欧洲公共卫生研究的文献计量学概述。
Eur J Public Health. 2007;17 Suppl 1:43-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckm063.
8
Environmental health research in Europe: bibliometric analysis.欧洲的环境卫生研究：文献计量分析
Eur J Public Health. 2007;17 Suppl 1:14-8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckm065.