Pancherz Hans, Michailidou Chrysoula
Department of Orthodontics, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Aug;126(2):153-61; quiz 254-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.07.015.
The aim of this long-term study was to assess the amount and direction of glenoid fossa displacement, condylar growth, and "effective" temporomandibular joint (TMJ) changes (= the sum of glenoid fossa displacement, condylar growth, and condylar position changes in the fossa) in 3 vertical facial-type groups of Class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance. A comparison was made between 38 normodivergent (ML/NSL= 26.5 degrees -36.5 degrees), 17 hypodivergent (ML/NSL <or= 26 degrees ), and 13 hyperdivergent (ML/NSL >or= 37 degrees ) subjects. Lateral headfilms from before, after, and 5 years after treatment were scrutinized. Glenoid fossa displacement, condylar growth, and "effective" TMJ changes were analyzed. Treatment changes: in all facial-type groups, the glenoid fossa was displaced anteriorly and inferiorly. No differences existed between the 3 groups. Condylar growth and "effective" TMJ changes were directed posteriorly and superiorly. The changes in posterior direction were more apparent in the hyperdivergent group than in the normodivergent and hypodivergent groups. Posttreatment changes: in all facial-type groups, the fossa was displaced posteriorly. No differences existed between the 3 groups. Condylar growth and "effective" TMJ changes were directed more vertically compared with the treatment changes. The changes in posterior direction were more pronounced in the hyperdivergent group than in the other 2 groups. It was found that the amount and direction of TMJ growth changes (fossa displacement, condylar growth, and "effective" TMJ changes) were only temporarily affected favorably in the sagittal direction by Herbst treatment. Condylar growth and "effective" TMJ changes were directed more posteriorly in hyperdivergent than in hypodivergent Herbst subjects. This was true for both treatment and posttreatment period changes.
这项长期研究的目的是评估使用Herbst矫治器治疗的3组垂直面型的安氏II类1分类错牙合患者的关节窝移位量和方向、髁突生长以及“有效”颞下颌关节(TMJ)变化(=关节窝移位、髁突生长以及髁突在关节窝内位置变化的总和)。对38例平均生长型(ML/NSL = 26.5度 - 36.5度)、17例低角型(ML/NSL≤26度)和13例高角型(ML/NSL≥37度)受试者进行了比较。仔细研究了治疗前、治疗后以及治疗后5年的头颅侧位片。分析了关节窝移位、髁突生长以及“有效”TMJ变化。治疗变化:在所有面型组中,关节窝均向前下方移位。3组之间无差异。髁突生长和“有效”TMJ变化方向为向后上方。高角型组向后方向的变化比平均生长型组和低角型组更明显。治疗后变化:在所有面型组中,关节窝向后移位。3组之间无差异。与治疗变化相比,髁突生长和“有效”TMJ变化方向更垂直。高角型组向后方向的变化比其他2组更明显。研究发现,TMJ生长变化(关节窝移位、髁突生长以及“有效”TMJ变化)的量和方向仅在矢状方向上受到Herbst治疗的暂时有利影响。高角型Herbst矫治患者的髁突生长和“有效”TMJ变化比低角型患者更向后。治疗期和治疗后期变化均如此。