• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奥马珠单抗治疗成人及青少年中重度过敏性哮喘的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of omalizumab in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma.

作者信息

Oba Yuji, Salzman Gary A

机构信息

Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, MO 64108-2792, USA.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Aug;114(2):265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.05.049.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2004.05.049
PMID:15316501
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Omalizumab can reduce hospitalization and emergency department visits and improve quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe, suboptimally controlled allergic asthma. Given the high cost and modest efficacy of this agent, it is not clear that it is cost-effective if given to a broad population with asthma.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of omalizumab in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma.

METHODS

A retrospective economic analysis was performed to determine the cost-effectiveness of omalizumab using 52-week data from 2 randomized controlled clinical trials in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma. The analysis was conducted from a third-party payer's perspective, and only direct costs were considered.

RESULTS

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios showed that the cost to achieve an additional successfully controlled day was $523, and the daily cost to achieve at least a 0.5-point increase in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score was $378 in 2003 dollars.

CONCLUSION

From a pharmacoeconomic standpoint, omalizumab would be better used in allergic asthmatic patients with poorly controlled symptoms despite maximal therapy, given the high cost and modest efficacy of this agent. It could be cost saving if given to nonsmoking patients who are hospitalized 5 or more times or 20 days or longer per year despite maximal asthma therapy.

摘要

背景

奥马珠单抗可减少中重度、控制不佳的过敏性哮喘患者的住院次数和急诊就诊次数,并改善其生活质量。鉴于该药物成本高昂且疗效一般,对于广泛的哮喘患者群体使用该药是否具有成本效益尚不清楚。

目的

本研究旨在评估奥马珠单抗在成人和青少年中重度过敏性哮喘患者中的成本效益。

方法

进行一项回顾性经济分析,利用两项针对成人和青少年中重度过敏性哮喘的随机对照临床试验的52周数据来确定奥马珠单抗的成本效益。该分析从第三方支付方的角度进行,仅考虑直接成本。

结果

增量成本效益比显示,在2003年美元价值下,实现额外一个成功控制日的成本为523美元,使哮喘生活质量问卷得分至少提高0.5分的每日成本为378美元。

结论

从药物经济学角度来看,鉴于奥马珠单抗成本高昂且疗效一般,对于症状尽管接受最大程度治疗仍控制不佳的过敏性哮喘患者,使用该药可能更为合适。对于尽管接受最大程度哮喘治疗但每年仍住院5次或更多次或住院20天或更长时间的非吸烟患者,使用该药可能会节省成本。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of omalizumab in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma.奥马珠单抗治疗成人及青少年中重度过敏性哮喘的成本效益分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Aug;114(2):265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.05.049.
2
Effectiveness of omalizumab in patients with inadequately controlled severe persistent allergic asthma: an open-label study.奥马珠单抗治疗严重持续性过敏性哮喘控制不佳患者的疗效:一项开放标签研究。
Respir Med. 2008 Oct;102(10):1371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
3
An evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of omalizumab for the treatment of severe allergic asthma.评估奥马珠单抗治疗重度过敏性哮喘的成本效益。
Allergy. 2008 Jun;63(6):670-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01723.x.
4
Anti-immunoglobulin E therapy with omalizumab for asthma.使用奥马珠单抗进行抗免疫球蛋白E治疗哮喘。
Ann Pharmacother. 2007 Sep;41(9):1397-410. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K005. Epub 2007 Aug 14.
5
Improvement in quality of life with omalizumab in patients with severe allergic asthma.奥马珠单抗改善重度过敏性哮喘患者的生活质量。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Nov;22(11):2201-8. doi: 10.1185/030079906X148643.
6
Cost-effectiveness of omalizumab in patients with severe persistent allergic asthma.奥马珠单抗治疗重度持续性过敏性哮喘患者的成本效益
Allergy. 2007 Feb;62(2):149-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01310.x.
7
Efficacy and tolerability of anti-immunoglobulin E therapy with omalizumab in patients with poorly controlled (moderate-to-severe) allergic asthma.奥马珠单抗抗免疫球蛋白E疗法治疗控制不佳(中度至重度)过敏性哮喘患者的疗效和耐受性
Allergy. 2004 Jul;59(7):701-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00533.x.
8
Benefits of omalizumab as add-on therapy in patients with severe persistent asthma who are inadequately controlled despite best available therapy (GINA 2002 step 4 treatment): INNOVATE.对于重度持续性哮喘患者,尽管接受了最佳可用治疗(《全球哮喘防治创议》2002版第4步治疗)但控制不佳时,奥马珠单抗作为附加治疗的益处:INNOVATE研究。
Allergy. 2005 Mar;60(3):309-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00772.x.
9
Add-on omalizumab improves day-to-day symptoms in inadequately controlled severe persistent allergic asthma.附加奥马珠单抗可改善控制不佳的重度持续性过敏性哮喘的日常症状。
Allergy. 2008 May;63(5):592-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01654.x. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
10
Omalizumab: a novel therapy for allergic asthma.奥马珠单抗:一种治疗过敏性哮喘的新型疗法。
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Jul-Aug;38(7-8):1236-42. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D626. Epub 2004 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing single-inhaler extrafine beclomethasone/formoterol/glycopyrronium bromide against other SITTs in adult patients with uncontrolled asthma in England.一项成本效益分析,比较单吸入器布地奈德/福莫特罗/格隆溴铵超细粉与其他长效吸入型支气管扩张剂治疗英国未控制哮喘成年患者的效果。
Health Econ Rev. 2025 May 23;15(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00640-9.
2
Anti-IL-5 therapies for asthma.哮喘的抗 IL-5 治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 12;7(7):CD010834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010834.pub4.
3
The pharmacoeconomics of the state-of-the-art drug treatments for asthma: a systematic review.
哮喘最新药物治疗的药物经济学:一项系统评价。
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2021 Aug 2;16(1):787. doi: 10.4081/mrm.2021.787. eCollection 2021 Jan 15.
4
The use of biologic therapies for the management of pediatric asthma.生物疗法在小儿哮喘管理中的应用。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 Mar;55(3):803-808. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24613. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
5
Cost-effectiveness of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measurement in predicting response to omalizumab in asthma.呼出一氧化氮分数(FeNO)测量在预测哮喘患者对奥马珠单抗反应中的成本效益
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 Apr 17;11:301-307. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S177207. eCollection 2019.
6
Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacological Treatments for Asthma: A Systematic Review.哮喘药物治疗的成本效益:系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Oct;36(10):1165-1200. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0668-8.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Biological Asthma Treatments: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Economic Evaluations.生物哮喘治疗的成本效益:系统评价及对未来经济评估的建议。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Aug;36(8):957-971. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0658-x.
8
Clinical and economic impact of a one-year treatment with omalizumab in patients with severe allergic asthma within a drug programme in Poland.波兰药物方案中奥马珠单抗治疗重度过敏性哮喘患者一年的临床和经济影响。
BMC Pulm Med. 2018 Mar 16;18(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0610-z.
9
Pediatric severe asthma: a case series report and perspectives on anti-IgE treatment.儿童重症哮喘:病例系列报告及抗IgE治疗的观点
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Feb 21;18(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1019-9.
10
Cost-effectiveness of tiotropium versus omalizumab for uncontrolled allergic asthma in US.噻托溴铵与奥马珠单抗治疗美国未控制的过敏性哮喘的成本效益
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 Jan 30;16:3. doi: 10.1186/s12962-018-0089-8. eCollection 2018.