Suppr超能文献

延迟期活动能解释工作记忆吗?

Can delay-period activity explain working memory?

作者信息

Sobotka Stanislaw, Diltz Mark D, Ringo James L

机构信息

Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Box 603, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester NY 14642, USA.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jan;93(1):128-36. doi: 10.1152/jn.01002.2003. Epub 2004 Aug 18.

Abstract

Working-memory tasks often lead to elevated delay-period discharge rates in cortical neurons. When this altered neuronal discharge rate, called delay activity, shows stimulus specificity, it is a good candidate for a neuronal mechanism of working memory. If the delay activity is indeed the carrier of memory, then experimental manipulation during the delay period that disrupts delay activity should also disrupt behavioral performance. We tested this hypothesis in two macaque monkeys with a delayed matching-to-sample task (delay time: 8 or 10 s) in which only two visual images were used. In each trial, one of the images was randomly chosen as the sample. In control trials (without disruptive stimulation), the monkeys performed at the level of 74.3% correct recognition. Three electrical stimulation levels (mild: a 0.25-s train of electrical pulses; medium: 1-s train; strong: 4 s), delivered to the hippocampal formation or to the orbito-frontal and inferotemporal cortices during delay period, decreased the performance to 71.4, 66.8, and 58.0% respectively (all are significantly less than control performance, P < 0.05 for mild stimulation and P < 0.0001 for other stimulation levels). Three hundred and thirty-four cells were recorded from inferotemporal (211 cells) and prefrontal (123 cells) cortices. Significant (P < 0.05) stimulus-specific delay activity was found in about one-third of recorded cells. For these cells in control trials, the mean difference in delay-period spike rates between preferred and nonpreferred images was 26%. The electrical stimulation reduced this difference to 20% (not a statistically significant reduction) in trials with mild stimulation, to 14% (P < 0.05) with medium stimulation, and just to 4% (P < 0.0005) with strong stimulation. These results, that increasing electrical stimulation reduced neuronal selectivity and at the same time reduced behavioral performance, directly support the hypothesis that delay activity is the carrier of memory through the delay period.

摘要

工作记忆任务常常导致皮层神经元在延迟期的放电率升高。当这种改变后的神经元放电率(称为延迟活动)表现出刺激特异性时,它是工作记忆神经元机制的一个很好的候选者。如果延迟活动确实是记忆的载体,那么在延迟期进行的破坏延迟活动的实验操作也应该会破坏行为表现。我们用延迟样本匹配任务(延迟时间:8或10秒,仅使用两个视觉图像)在两只猕猴身上测试了这一假设。在每次试验中,随机选择其中一幅图像作为样本。在对照试验(无干扰刺激)中,猴子的正确识别率为74.3%。在延迟期向海马结构或眶额和颞下皮质施加三种电刺激水平(轻度:0.25秒的电脉冲串;中度:1秒的电脉冲串;重度:4秒),分别将表现降低到71.4%、66.8%和58.0%(均显著低于对照表现,轻度刺激P<0.05,其他刺激水平P<0.0001)。从颞下皮质(211个细胞)和前额叶皮质(123个细胞)记录了334个细胞。在大约三分之一的记录细胞中发现了显著的(P<0.05)刺激特异性延迟活动。对于对照试验中的这些细胞,偏好图像和非偏好图像在延迟期的放电率平均差异为26%。在轻度刺激试验中,电刺激将这种差异降低到20%(无统计学显著降低),在中度刺激试验中降低到14%(P<0.05),在重度刺激试验中仅降低到4%(P<0.0005)。这些结果,即增加电刺激会降低神经元选择性并同时降低行为表现,直接支持了延迟活动是延迟期记忆载体的假设。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验