Jouen F, Vittecoq O, Leguillou F, Tabti-Titon I, Menard J F, Mejjad O, Pouplin S, Boumier P, Fardellone P, Gayet A, Gilbert D, Tron F, Le Loët X
INSERM 519, Institut Fédératif de Recherche Multidisciplinaire sur les Peptides (IFR MP 23), Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie, Rouen, France.
Clin Exp Immunol. 2004 Sep;137(3):606-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02552.x.
The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic and prognostic values of antiglucose-6-phosphate isomerase (GPI) antibodies in patients with very early arthritis. Anti-GPI antibodies were measured by ELISA using purified GPI from rabbit muscle in: (i) 383 sera from healthy blood donors (n = 120), well-established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (n = 99) and non-RA differentiated arthritis (NRADA) (n = 164) patients; (ii) 195 sera obtained from community-recruited patients with very early inflammatory arthritis (VErA cohort) that were studied for 1 year and classified as having RA (n = 116), NRADA (n = 41), and undifferentiated arthritis (UA) (n = 38) after the follow-up period. The criterion for severity was the progression of radiographic damage. Prevalence of anti-GPI antibodies was significantly higher in well-established RA patients (45.4%) compared to healthy subjects (2.5%). Anti-GPI antibodies were also present in sera from NRADA: systemic lupus erythematosus 53%, polymyositis 45.4%, adult-onset Still's disease 44%, systemic sclerosis 42.8%, spondylarthropathies 25% and primary Sjögren's syndrome 5.8%. No significant association was found between the presence of anti-GPI antibodies and the 3 diagnostic groups from the VErA cohort. No correlation was observed between anti-GPI and autoantibodies usually associated with RA. Anti-GPI antibodies were not predictive of radiological progression in patients with very early arthritis. Thus, anti-GPI antibodies are not useful for discriminating RA from non-RA rheumatic diseases and do not constitute a predictive factor of structural damage.
本研究的目的是确定抗葡萄糖-6-磷酸异构酶(GPI)抗体在极早期关节炎患者中的诊断和预后价值。使用从兔肌肉中纯化的GPI,通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测抗GPI抗体,检测对象包括:(i)383份血清,分别来自健康献血者(n = 120)、确诊的类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者(n = 99)和非RA分化性关节炎(NRADA)患者(n = 164);(ii)195份血清,取自社区招募的极早期炎性关节炎患者(VErA队列),对这些患者进行了1年的研究,并在随访期后将其分类为患有RA(n = 116)、NRADA(n = 41)和未分化关节炎(UA)(n = 38)。严重程度的标准是影像学损伤的进展。确诊的RA患者中抗GPI抗体的患病率(45.4%)显著高于健康受试者(2.5%)。抗GPI抗体也存在于NRADA患者的血清中:系统性红斑狼疮患者中为53%,多发性肌炎患者中为45.4%,成人斯蒂尔病患者中为44%,系统性硬化症患者中为42.8%,脊柱关节病患者中为25%,原发性干燥综合征患者中为5.8%。在VErA队列的3个诊断组中,未发现抗GPI抗体的存在与它们之间有显著关联。未观察到抗GPI抗体与通常与RA相关的自身抗体之间存在相关性。抗GPI抗体不能预测极早期关节炎患者的放射学进展。因此,抗GPI抗体对于区分RA与非RA风湿性疾病并无用处,也不构成结构损伤的预测因素。