Suppr超能文献

Standard preoxygenation technique versus two rapid techniques in pregnant patients.

作者信息

Chiron B, Laffon M, Ferrandiere M, Pittet J F, Marret H, Mercier C

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Surgery, University Hospital, Tours, France.

出版信息

Int J Obstet Anesth. 2004 Jan;13(1):11-4. doi: 10.1016/S0959-289X(03)00095-5.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare three different preoxygenation techniques in pregnant women by measuring end-tidal fractional oxygen concentration (FETO2): the traditional technique of 3min tidal volume breathing (VT x 3 min), 8 deep breaths (8 DB) and 4 deep breaths (4 DB). Twenty pregnant volunteers without pulmonary diseases were studied during the third trimester (36-38 weeks' gestation). Women were preoxygentated using a non-rebreathing respiratory circuit with a 3-L reservoir bag and a Capnomac Ultima calibrated before each patient to monitor FETO2 continuously. The three preoxygenation techniques were investigated in random order: VT x 3 min using an oxygen flow of 9 L min-1, 4 DB within 30s using an oxygen flow of 9 L min-1, and 8 DB within one minute using an oxygen flow of 15 L min-1. Between each technique, 5-min room air breathing was allowed to return to baseline FETO2 assessed by the Capnomac Ultima. An FETO2 >/= 90% was achieved more frequently with the VT x 3 min and the 8 DB techniques (76%) than with the 4 DB technique (18%) (P < 0.05). The average time required for obtaining an FETO2 >/= 90% was 107+/-37s. Both the VT x 3 min and the 8 DB techniques are therefore more effective for preoxygenation in pregnant patients than the 4 DB technique. In an acute obstetric emergency before rapid-sequence induction of general anaesthesia, 8 DB preoxygenation technique could be recommended.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验