用于记录非癌性疼痛患者治疗结果的简明疼痛量表的效度

Validity of the brief pain inventory for use in documenting the outcomes of patients with noncancer pain.

作者信息

Keller San, Bann Carla M, Dodd Sheri L, Schein Jeff, Mendoza Tito R, Cleeland Charles S

机构信息

American Institutes for Research, Chapel Hill, NC 27514-2825, USA.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2004 Sep-Oct;20(5):309-18. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200409000-00005.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is a short, self-administered questionnaire that was developed for use in cancer patients. While most empirical research with the BPI has been in pain of that etiology, the questionnaire is increasingly evident in published studies of patients with non-cancer pain. The current research addresses the need for formal evaluation of the reliability and validity of the BPI for use in non-cancer pain patients.

METHODS

Approximately 250 patients with arthritis or low back pain (LBP) self-administered a number of generic and condition-specific health status measures (including the BPI) in the clinic of their primary care provider at 2 time points: the initial clinic visit and the first visit following treatment.

RESULTS

The reliability of BPI data collected from non-cancer pain patients was comparable to that reported in the literature for cancer patients and sufficient for group-level analyses (coefficient alphas were greater than 0.70). The factor structure of the BPI was replicated in this sample and the relationship of the BPI to generic measures of pain was strong. The BPI exhibited similar relationships to general and condition-specific measures of health as did a generic pain scale (SF-36 Bodily Pain). Finally, the BPI discriminated among levels of condition severity and was sensitive to change in condition over time in arthritis and LBP patients.

DISCUSSION

Results support the validity of the BPI as a measure of pain in patients without cancer and, in particular, as a measure of pain for arthritis and LBP patients.

摘要

目的

简明疼痛问卷(BPI)是一种简短的自填式问卷,专为癌症患者设计。虽然大多数关于BPI的实证研究都针对癌症病因引起的疼痛,但该问卷在非癌症疼痛患者的已发表研究中越来越常见。当前的研究旨在正式评估BPI用于非癌症疼痛患者的信度和效度。

方法

约250名患有关节炎或腰痛(LBP)的患者在其初级保健提供者的诊所分两个时间点自行填写了一些通用的和特定疾病的健康状况测量问卷(包括BPI):初次就诊时和治疗后的首次就诊时。

结果

从非癌症疼痛患者收集的BPI数据的信度与文献中报道的癌症患者的信度相当,足以进行组水平分析(系数α大于0.70)。本样本复制了BPI的因子结构,且BPI与疼痛通用测量指标的关系密切。BPI与健康通用测量指标和特定疾病测量指标的关系与通用疼痛量表(SF-36身体疼痛量表)相似。最后,BPI能够区分疾病严重程度水平,并且对关节炎和LBP患者病情随时间的变化敏感。

讨论

结果支持BPI作为非癌症患者疼痛测量工具的效度,特别是作为关节炎和LBP患者疼痛测量工具的效度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索