Taylor David M, Young Corina L, Mace Shubhra, Patel Maxine X
Pharmacy Department, Maudsley Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Aug;65(8):1076-83. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v65n0808.
The use of risperidone long-acting injection (RLAI) is reasonably well supported by controlled studies. Little is known about treatment outcomes in patients receiving RLAI in clinical practice.
All prescribers in the South London and Maudsley Trust, London, United Kingdom, were informed that RLAI could be ordered for suitable patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizo-affective disorder: those known to be noncompliant with oral atypical antipsychotics and those intolerant of the adverse effects of conventional depot antipsychotics. Prescribers provided treatment and clinical progress data at the time of each prescription. Data collected included reason for prescribing RLAI, Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI) score, inpatient or out-patient status, and details of all medications prescribed. All treatment discontinuations were investigated. The study was conducted from August 2002 to August 2003.
Outcome could be determined for 100 subjects. Seventy-nine subjects (79%) were hospitalized when RLAI was initially prescribed. Mean duration of stay before RLAI initiation was 97 days (range, 0-1492 days). Most subjects were switched to RLAI from oral atypical (58%) or conventional depot (28%) antipsychotics. The main reason given for prescribing RLAI was poor patient acceptability of previous treatments (79%). Overall, 51% of the subjects discontinued RLAI. The main reason for discontinuation was lack of effect (24 subjects). No patient-related factor predicted outcome. CGI scores improved from a mean of 4.7 to 3.6 over the study period (p <.001). Overall, 61 subjects (61%) showed an improvement in CGI scores between baseline and endpoint. Antipsychotic coprescriptions were reduced from 71% of subjects to 8%. In completers, 23 (61%) of 38 subjects beginning RLAI as inpatients were discharged. The modal dose of RLAI was 25 mg every 2 weeks.
RLAI was moderately effective in clinical practice as judged by attrition from treatment. CGI score changes and discharge rates also suggest moderate effectiveness. RLAI was well tolerated. Antipsychotic coprescription was infrequent.
对照研究对使用利培酮长效注射剂(RLAI)给予了合理充分的支持。对于在临床实践中接受RLAI治疗的患者的治疗结果,人们了解甚少。
告知英国伦敦南伦敦和莫兹利国民保健信托基金的所有开处方者,对于符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍诊断标准的合适患者,可开具RLAI:即那些已知不依从口服非典型抗精神病药物治疗的患者以及对传统长效抗精神病药物不良反应不耐受的患者。开处方者在每次开处方时提供治疗及临床进展数据。收集的数据包括开具RLAI的原因、临床总体印象量表(CGI)评分、住院或门诊状态以及所有开具药物的详细信息。对所有治疗中断情况进行了调查。该研究于2002年8月至2003年8月进行。
可为100名受试者确定治疗结果。最初开具RLAI时,79名受试者(79%)正在住院。开始使用RLAI之前的平均住院时间为97天(范围为0 - 1492天)。大多数受试者是从口服非典型抗精神病药物(58%)或传统长效抗精神病药物(28%)转换为RLAI治疗。开具RLAI的主要原因是先前治疗的患者接受度差(79%)。总体而言,51%的受试者停用了RLAI。停药的主要原因是无效(24名受试者)。没有患者相关因素可预测治疗结果。在研究期间,CGI评分从平均4.7改善至3.6(p <.001)。总体而言,61名受试者(61%)在基线和终点之间CGI评分有所改善。同时使用抗精神病药物的比例从71%的受试者降至8%。在完成治疗的患者中,38名开始时为住院患者的受试者中有23名(61%)出院。RLAI的标准剂量为每2周25毫克。
从治疗的持续性判断,RLAI在临床实践中具有中等疗效。CGI评分变化和出院率也表明其具有中等疗效。RLAI耐受性良好。同时使用抗精神病药物的情况并不常见。