Akl Elie A, Izuchukwu Ifeoma S, El-Dika Samer, Fritsche Lutz, Kunz Regina, Schünemann Holger J
Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo, ECMC-CC 142, 462 Grider St., Buffalo, NY 14215, USA.
Acad Med. 2004 Sep;79(9):897-904. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200409000-00018.
To measure the impact of a resident focused evidence-based medicine (EBM) educational intervention on EBM knowledge of residents and students, to assess its feasibility, and to evaluate residents' attitudes regarding this rotation.
In 2002, based on the EBM user and EBM practitioner model, the authors designed the EBM elective rotation and conducted a controlled trial of its implementation in the internal medicine residency program in three teaching hospitals affiliated with the University at Buffalo, New York. The intervention group (one hospital, 17 medical students and residents) received a multifaceted intervention. In the control group (two hospitals, 23 medical students and residents), there was no curriculum change. The effectiveness in a pre- and post-test was assessed using the English version of the Berlin Questionnaire. A survey of all internal medicine residents (n = 119) was conducted to evaluate their attitudes toward the EBM elective rotation.
In the intervention group, knowledge improved slightly, but not significantly (.71 on a scale ranging from 0-15 on the Berlin questionnaire, p =.3). The mean score in the control group decreased significantly (1.65, p =.005). The difference in change scores between the two groups was significant even after adjustment for covariates (2.52, p =.006). Residents (response rate 83%) had positive attitudes regarding the rotation.
An EBM elective rotation was successfully integrated into a residency program. This multifaceted educational approach with an "on-the-ward" EBM resident, may improve the EBM knowledge and skills of targeted students and residents.
评估以住院医师为重点的循证医学(EBM)教育干预对住院医师和学生循证医学知识的影响,评估其可行性,并评价住院医师对此次轮转的态度。
2002年,作者基于循证医学使用者和循证医学实践者模型,设计了循证医学选修轮转课程,并在纽约州布法罗大学附属的三家教学医院的内科住院医师培训项目中进行了实施该课程的对照试验。干预组(一家医院,17名医学生和住院医师)接受了多方面的干预。对照组(两家医院,23名医学生和住院医师)未进行课程更改。使用英文版的柏林问卷评估前后测的效果。对所有内科住院医师(n = 119)进行了一项调查,以评估他们对循证医学选修轮转的态度。
在干预组中,知识略有提高,但不显著(柏林问卷得分从0至15,为0.71,p = 0.3)。对照组的平均得分显著下降(1.65,p = 0.005)。即使在对协变量进行调整后,两组变化分数的差异仍很显著(2.52,p = 0.006)。住院医师(回复率83%)对此次轮转持积极态度。
循证医学选修轮转课程成功纳入住院医师培训项目。这种采用“病房内”循证医学住院医师的多方面教育方法,可能会提高目标学生和住院医师的循证医学知识和技能。