Steffen Walter, Sleep John
Randall Centre, King's College, London SE1 1UL, United Kingdom.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 31;101(35):12904-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400227101. Epub 2004 Aug 23.
The central features of the mechanical cycle that drives the contraction of muscle are two translational steps: the working stroke, whereby an attached myosin crossbridge moves relative to the actin filament, and the repriming step, in which the crossbridge returns to its original orientation. Although the mechanism of the first of these is understood in some detail, that of the second has received less attention. Here, we show that repriming occurs after detachment of the crossbridge from the actin, rather than intervening between two actomyosin states with ATP bound [Eisenberg, E. & Greene, L. E. (1980) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 42, 293-309]. To discriminate between these two models we investigated the single-molecule mechanics of the myosin-actin interaction in the presence of ATP analogues such as GTP, for which the hydrolytic step itself limits the actomyosin GTPase rate to a much lower rate than for ATP. The lifetimes of bound states was proportional to 1/[GTP], indicating that during the bound period myosin was in the actomyosin rigor configuration. Moreover, despite the very low actomyosin GTPase, the rate of actin binding and formation of the rigor state was higher than with ATP; it follows that most interactions with actin result in the release of GTP and not of the products, GDP and phosphate. There was no significant movement of the actin during this interaction, so repriming must occur while myosin is dissociated, as in the original Lymn-Taylor scheme [Lymn, R. W. & Taylor, E. W. (1971) Biochemistry 10, 4617-4624].
工作冲程,即附着的肌球蛋白横桥相对于肌动蛋白丝移动;以及再引发步骤,即横桥恢复到其原始方向。虽然对其中第一个步骤的机制已经有了一些详细的了解,但第二个步骤的机制受到的关注较少。在这里,我们表明再引发发生在横桥从肌动蛋白上脱离之后,而不是介于两个结合有ATP的肌动球蛋白状态之间[艾森伯格,E. & 格林,L. E.(1980年)《生理学年度评论》42卷,293 - 309页]。为了区分这两种模型,我们研究了在存在诸如GTP等ATP类似物的情况下肌球蛋白 - 肌动蛋白相互作用的单分子力学,对于GTP,水解步骤本身将肌动球蛋白GTP酶速率限制在比ATP低得多的水平。结合状态的寿命与1/[GTP]成正比,表明在结合期间肌球蛋白处于肌动球蛋白强直构型。此外,尽管肌动球蛋白GTP酶非常低,但肌动蛋白结合和强直状态形成的速率高于使用ATP时;由此可知,与肌动蛋白的大多数相互作用导致GTP的释放,而不是产物GDP和磷酸的释放。在这种相互作用期间肌动蛋白没有明显移动,因此再引发必须在肌球蛋白解离时发生,就像在原始的林恩 - 泰勒方案中那样[林恩,R. W. & 泰勒,E. W.(1971年)《生物化学》10卷,4617 - 4624页]。