• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊护士的分诊决策能否预测急性冠脉综合征患者入院或出院诊断的差异?

Do emergency nurses' triage decisions predict differences in admission or discharge diagnoses for acute coronary syndromes?

作者信息

Arslanian-Engoren Cynthia

机构信息

University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004 Jul-Aug;19(4):280-6. doi: 10.1097/00005082-200407000-00008.

DOI:10.1097/00005082-200407000-00008
PMID:15326983
Abstract

Coronary heart disease is the number 1 killer of adults in the United States, affecting 1 in 5 men and women. However, women are more likely than men to die after an acute coronary event and are less likely to receive prompt or aggressive treatment. Few studies have examined the role of emergency nurses' triage decisions in these disparities, even though nurses often determine initial patient priority and urgency status for emergency cardiac evaluation and treatment. The purpose of this prospective study was to examine if nurses' initial triage decisions could predict admission or discharge diagnoses for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). A total of 108 nurses' triage decisions made by 13 nurses were examined. There were no differences in nurses' triage decisions based on patient gender, race, or age. By multivariate analysis, chest pain, history of coronary heart disease, history of myocardial infarction, and smoking were predictive of an ACS decision. Overall, accuracy for predicting admission diagnosis was poor. Sensitivity and specificity were 57% and 59%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 68% and a negative predictive value of 56%. It was similarly poor for predicting discharge diagnosis. Sensitivity and specificity for discharge diagnosis were 55% and 69%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 17% and a negative predictive value of 93%. Findings indicate limitations in the ability of nurses' triage decisions to predict admission and discharge diagnoses for ACS.

摘要

冠心病是美国成年人的头号杀手,每5名男性和女性中就有1人受其影响。然而,女性在急性冠状动脉事件后死亡的可能性比男性更高,而且接受及时或积极治疗的可能性更小。尽管护士通常会确定患者接受紧急心脏评估和治疗的初始优先级和紧急状态,但很少有研究探讨急诊护士的分诊决策在这些差异中所起的作用。这项前瞻性研究的目的是检验护士的初始分诊决策是否能够预测急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的入院或出院诊断。研究共检查了13名护士做出的108项分诊决策。护士的分诊决策在患者性别、种族或年龄方面没有差异。通过多变量分析,胸痛、冠心病史、心肌梗死史和吸烟是ACS决策的预测因素。总体而言,预测入院诊断的准确性较差。敏感性和特异性分别为57%和59%,阳性预测值为68%,阴性预测值为56%。预测出院诊断的情况同样不佳。出院诊断的敏感性和特异性分别为55%和69%,阳性预测值为17%,阴性预测值为93%。研究结果表明,护士的分诊决策在预测ACS入院和出院诊断方面存在局限性。

相似文献

1
Do emergency nurses' triage decisions predict differences in admission or discharge diagnoses for acute coronary syndromes?急诊护士的分诊决策能否预测急性冠脉综合征患者入院或出院诊断的差异?
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004 Jul-Aug;19(4):280-6. doi: 10.1097/00005082-200407000-00008.
2
Patient cues that predict nurses' triage decisions for acute coronary syndromes.预测护士对急性冠脉综合征分诊决策的患者线索。
Appl Nurs Res. 2005 May;18(2):82-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2004.06.013.
3
Using a genetic algorithm to predict evaluation of acute coronary syndromes.使用遗传算法预测急性冠状动脉综合征的评估。
Nurs Res. 2007 Mar-Apr;56(2):82-8. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000263965.16501.26.
4
Explicating nurses' cardiac triage decisions.解读护士的心脏分诊决策。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):50-7. doi: 10.1097/01.JCN.0000317474.50424.4f.
5
Triage nurses' decisions using the National Triage Scale for Australian emergency departments.分诊护士使用澳大利亚急诊科国家分诊量表进行的决策。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2000 Oct;8(4):201-9. doi: 10.1054/aaen.2000.0166.
6
Australian triage nurses' decision-making and scope of practice.澳大利亚分诊护士的决策制定与执业范围。
Aust J Adv Nurs. 2000 Sep-Nov;18(1):24-33.
7
Accuracy of triage nurses in predicting patient disposition.分诊护士预测患者处置情况的准确性。
Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Aug;19(4):341-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00996.x.
8
Manchester Triage in Sweden - interrater reliability and accuracy.瑞典的曼彻斯特分诊法——评估者间信度与准确性
Int Emerg Nurs. 2009 Jul;17(3):143-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2008.11.008. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
9
Gender and age differences in nurses' triage decisions using vignette patients.使用病例 vignette 患者时护士分诊决策中的性别和年龄差异。
Nurs Res. 2001 Jan-Feb;50(1):61-6. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200101000-00009.
10
Commentary: "Explicating nurses' cardiac triage decisions".评论:“解读护士的心脏分诊决策”
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):48-9. doi: 10.1097/01.JCN.0000343560.98989.3a.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Emergency Severity Index (ESI) level, hospital admission, and admitting ward in an emergency department using data-driven machine learning.使用数据驱动的机器学习预测急诊科的急诊严重程度指数(ESI)级别、住院情况及收治科室。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 28;25(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02941-9.
2
Ethnic Disparities in Emergency Severity Index Scores among U.S. Veteran's Affairs Emergency Department Patients.美国退伍军人事务部急诊科患者中急诊严重程度指数评分的种族差异。
PLoS One. 2015 May 29;10(5):e0126792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126792. eCollection 2015.