Behrman Stephen W, Rush Benjamin T, Dilawari Raza A
Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, USA.
Am Surg. 2004 Aug;70(8):675-82; discussion 682-3.
Complications after pancreatic resection remain prevalent. Procedure-related morbidity has previously focused on prevention of pancreatic and biliary fistulas (PFs and BFs) with other complications receiving less attention. We examined morbidity and its impact on reoperation, length of stay (LOS), and mortality following pancreatic resection. We retrospectively reviewed patients having elective pancreatectomy at the University of Tennessee affiliated hospitals during a recent 5-year time period. Factors examined included morbidity, mortality, and the need for reoperation. Patient deaths were analyzed with a focus on antecedent complications. Comparisons were made using Student's t test and chi2 analysis where appropriated. From 1997 to 2003, 125 patients had pancreatic resections: 93 Whipple procedures, 27 distal, and 5 total pancreatectomies. Twenty-nine patients (23%) did not have intraperitoneal drainage (IPD). Resections were performed for cancer in 75 per cent. Seventy complications occurred in 55 patients (44%). Morbidity related to an intra-abdominal process resulted in 16 reoperations and 4/6 deaths in this series (overall mortality, 4.8%). There were no BFs. Of 10 patients with PFs (8%), none required reoperation, and there was no PF-related mortality. No patient without IPD developed a PF. The presence of a PF significantly increased LOS when compared to those without (30.9 +/- 13.1 vs 17.4 +/- 12.2 days, P < 0.01). Forty-four per cent of all complications were related to either intra-abdominal abscess (IAA), hemorrhage, or feeding tube placement (18, 8, and 5, respectively). Management of IAA included percutaneous drainage in 16 and reoperation in 2 with 1 associated death. Hemorrhage necessitated reoperation in 6, resulted in 1 patient death, and was followed by IAA in 2. Of 5 jejunostomy tube complications, 4 required reoperation and 2 patients died. LOS was significantly greater in these 28 patients when compared to all others (28.1 +/- 16.9 vs 15.8 +/- 9.9 days, P < 0.001). Following pancreatectomy, 1) BFs should be a rare event; 2) PFs remain important but are most often managed nonoperatively with few sequelae; 3) in this series, IAA and hemorrhage were more common than PF, frequently mandated reoperation, prolonged hospitalization, and were associated with procedure related mortality; 4) feeding tube complications, though rare, are often catastrophic; 5) future efforts should focus on factors that could reduce abscess formation and a reduction in overall complications--many of which are potentially preventable.
胰腺切除术后并发症仍然很常见。与手术相关的发病率以前主要集中在预防胰瘘和胆瘘(PFs和BFs),而其他并发症受到的关注较少。我们研究了胰腺切除术后的发病率及其对再次手术、住院时间(LOS)和死亡率的影响。我们回顾性分析了田纳西大学附属医院最近5年期间接受择期胰腺切除术的患者。研究因素包括发病率、死亡率和再次手术的必要性。对患者死亡情况进行分析,重点关注先前的并发症。在适当的情况下,使用学生t检验和卡方分析进行比较。1997年至2003年,125例患者接受了胰腺切除术:93例Whipple手术,27例远端胰腺切除术,5例全胰腺切除术。29例患者(23%)未进行腹腔内引流(IPD)。75%的手术是因癌症进行的。55例患者(44%)发生了70例并发症。本系列中,与腹腔内病变相关的发病率导致16例再次手术和4/6例死亡(总死亡率为4.8%)。没有发生胆瘘。10例发生胰瘘的患者(8%)中,无人需要再次手术,且没有与胰瘘相关的死亡。没有进行IPD的患者未发生胰瘘。与未发生胰瘘的患者相比,发生胰瘘的患者住院时间显著延长(30.9±13.1天对17.4±12.2天,P<0.01)。所有并发症的44%与腹腔内脓肿(IAA)、出血或饲管放置有关(分别为18例、8例和5例)。IAA的处理包括16例经皮引流和2例再次手术,其中1例相关死亡。6例出血需要再次手术,导致1例患者死亡,2例随后发生IAA。5例空肠造口管并发症中,4例需要再次手术,2例患者死亡。与所有其他患者相比,这28例患者的住院时间显著更长(28.1±16.9天对15.8±9.9天,P<0.001)。胰腺切除术后,1)胆瘘应是罕见事件;2)胰瘘仍然很重要,但大多数情况下通过非手术治疗,后遗症较少;3)在本系列中,IAA和出血比胰瘘更常见,经常需要再次手术、延长住院时间,且与手术相关死亡率有关;4)饲管并发症虽然罕见,但往往具有灾难性;5)未来的努力应集中在可减少脓肿形成和降低总体并发症的因素上——其中许多并发症是潜在可预防的。