• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对患者、医疗服务提供者和医疗保健机构的干预措施。

Interventions for patients, providers, and health care organizations.

作者信息

Zapka Jane G, Lemon Stephenie C

机构信息

Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2004 Sep 1;101(5 Suppl):1165-87. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20504.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.20504
PMID:15329892
Abstract

Clinicians and the organizations within which they practice play a major role in enabling patient participation in cancer screening and ensuring quality services. Guided by an ecologic framework, the authors summarize previous literature reviews and exemplary studies of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening intervention studies conducted in health care settings. Lessons learned regarding interventions to maximize the potential of cancer screening are distilled. Four broad lessons learned emphasize that multiple levels of factors-public policy, organizational systems and practice settings, clinicians, and patients-influence cancer screening; that a diverse set of intervention strategies targeted at each of these levels can improve cancer screening rates; that the synergistic effects of multiple strategies often are most effective; and that targeting all components of the screening continuum is important. Recommendations are made for future research and practice, including priorities for intervention research specific to health care settings, the need to take research phases into consideration, the need for studies of health services delivery trends, and methods and measurement issues.

摘要

临床医生及其执业所在的组织在促使患者参与癌症筛查及确保优质服务方面发挥着重要作用。在一个生态框架的指导下,作者总结了先前在医疗保健环境中进行的乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查干预研究的文献综述及典型研究。提炼出了关于最大化癌症筛查潜力的干预措施的经验教训。总结出的四大经验教训强调,多个层面的因素——公共政策、组织系统和实践环境、临床医生以及患者——都会影响癌症筛查;针对这些层面中的每一个层面的一系列不同的干预策略都可以提高癌症筛查率;多种策略的协同效应往往最为有效;以及针对筛查连续统一体的所有组成部分很重要。针对未来的研究和实践提出了建议,包括针对医疗保健环境的干预研究的优先事项、考虑研究阶段的必要性、对卫生服务提供趋势进行研究的必要性以及方法和测量问题。

相似文献

1
Interventions for patients, providers, and health care organizations.针对患者、医疗服务提供者和医疗保健机构的干预措施。
Cancer. 2004 Sep 1;101(5 Suppl):1165-87. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20504.
2
Breast and cervical cancer screening: clinicians' views on health plan guidelines and implementation efforts.乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查:临床医生对健康计划指南及实施工作的看法。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005(35):46-54. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi037.
3
Interventions to increase recommendation and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare providers systematic reviews of provider assessment and feedback and provider incentives.通过对医疗服务提供者评估与反馈以及医疗服务提供者激励措施的系统评价,来增加医疗服务提供者对乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的推荐及实施的干预措施。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jul;35(1 Suppl):S67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.008.
4
Implementation of systems strategies for breast and cervical cancer screening services in health maintenance organizations.健康维护组织中乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查服务系统策略的实施。
Am J Manag Care. 2003 Nov;9(11):745-55.
5
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
6
Lessons learned from community-based cancer screening intervention research.基于社区的癌症筛查干预研究的经验教训。
Cancer. 2004 Sep 1;101(5 Suppl):1146-64. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20508.
7
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.
8
Increasing cancer screening: a meta-analysis.增加癌症筛查:一项荟萃分析。
Prev Med. 1996 Nov-Dec;25(6):702-7. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1996.0109.
9
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
10
A framework for improving the quality of cancer care: the case of breast and cervical cancer screening.提高癌症护理质量的框架:以乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查为例。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003 Jan;12(1):4-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Multilevel and multicomponent intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening among underserved Vietnamese Americans: A cluster randomized trial.多层次多组分干预措施促进越南裔美国弱势群体的结直肠癌筛查:一项整群随机试验
Res Sq. 2024 Feb 8:rs.3.rs-3934937. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3934937/v1.
2
The use of individual and multilevel data in the development of a risk prediction model to predict patients' likelihood of completing colorectal cancer screening.在开发风险预测模型以预测患者完成结直肠癌筛查可能性的过程中使用个体和多层次数据。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Aug 11;36:102366. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102366. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening: A Framework-Driven Systematic Review.
肺癌筛查实施的促进因素和障碍:基于框架的系统综述。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Nov 14;114(11):1449-1467. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac154.
4
Report from an NCI Roundtable: Cancer Prevention in Primary Care.NCI 圆桌会议报告:初级保健中的癌症预防。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2022 May 3;15(5):273-278. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-21-0599.
5
Self-management support in flemish primary care practice: the development of a preliminary conceptual model using a qualitative approach. Flemish 初级保健实践中的自我管理支持:使用定性方法开发初步概念模型。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Mar 31;23(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01652-8.
6
There's just not enough time: a mixed methods pilot study of hepatitis C virus screening among baby boomers in primary care.时间不够:初级保健中对婴儿潮一代进行丙型肝炎病毒筛查的混合方法试点研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Dec 2;21(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01327-2.
7
Assessment of and Interventions for Women at High Risk for Breast or Ovarian Cancer: A Survey of Primary Care Physicians.高危乳腺癌或卵巢癌女性的评估和干预:一项初级保健医生调查。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 Feb;14(2):205-214. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0407. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
8
Understanding barriers to lung cancer screening in primary care.了解初级保健中肺癌筛查的障碍。
J Thorac Dis. 2020 May;12(5):2536-2544. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.66.
9
Follow-up approaches to a health literacy intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening in rural community clinics: A randomized controlled trial.健康素养干预后随访方法对提高农村社区诊所结直肠癌筛查率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Cancer. 2019 Oct 15;125(20):3615-3622. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32398. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
10
Patient perspectives on colorectal cancer screening and the role of general practice.患者对结直肠癌筛查的看法及全科医疗的作用。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Jul 29;20(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0997-5.