Suppr超能文献

注意力追踪比注意力扫视更快。

Attentional pursuit is faster than attentional saccade.

作者信息

Horowitz Todd S, Holcombe Alex O, Wolfe Jeremy M, Arsenio Helga C, DiMase Jennifer S

机构信息

Visual Attention Laboratory, Brigham & Women's Hospital, and Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Vis. 2004 Jul 20;4(7):585-603. doi: 10.1167/4.7.6.

Abstract

How quickly can we shift the focus of visual attention? We compared the rates of two types of attentional shifts: attentional saccades (shifts between objects) and attentional pursuit (shifts along with a moving object). Instead of measuring the time required for a single shift, which confounds shift time with cue interpretation time, we measured the pace at which observers could make multiple successive shifts in a predictable order. We find that successive attentional saccades between objects are quite slow (300-500 ms). The object-based theory of attention predicts that attention should shift between locations more quickly when in pursuit of a moving object. Our results support this theory. Attentional pursuit is substantially faster--taking only 200-250 ms to cover the same distance. "Indexing" a moving object (keeping track of one object) can be done at even faster rates, supporting a distinction between attending to and indexing objects.

摘要

我们转移视觉注意力的速度有多快?我们比较了两种注意力转移的速度:注意力扫视(在物体之间转移)和注意力追踪(随着移动物体转移)。我们没有测量单次转移所需的时间,因为这会将转移时间与线索解释时间混淆,而是测量了观察者能够以可预测的顺序进行多次连续转移的速度。我们发现,物体之间连续的注意力扫视相当缓慢(300 - 500毫秒)。基于物体的注意力理论预测,当追踪移动物体时,注意力在不同位置之间的转移应该更快。我们的结果支持了这一理论。注意力追踪要快得多——覆盖相同距离仅需200 - 250毫秒。对移动物体进行“索引”(跟踪一个物体)的速度甚至更快,这支持了对关注物体和索引物体的区分。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验