Chen Jen-Tse, Lin Yung-Yang, Shan Din-E, Wu Zin-An, Hallett Mark, Liao Kwong-Kum
Department of Neurology, the Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, 201, Section II, Shih-Pai Rd., Pei-tou District, Taipei 11217, Taiwan.
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jan;93(1):53-63. doi: 10.1152/jn.01063.2003. Epub 2004 Aug 25.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex can interrupt voluntary contralateral rhythmic limb movements. Using the method of "resetting index" (RI), our study investigated the TMS effect on different types of bimanual movements. Six normal subjects participated. For unimanual movement, each subject tapped either the right or left index finger at a comfortable rate. For bimanual movement, index fingers of both hands tapped in the same (in-phase) direction or in the opposite (antiphase) direction. TMS was applied to each hemisphere separately at various intensities from 0.5 to 1.5 times motor threshold (MT). TMS interruption of rhythm was quantified by RI. For the unimanual movements, TMS disrupted both contralateral and ipsilateral rhythmic hand movements, although the effect was much less in the ipsilateral hand. For the bimanual in-phase task, TMS could simultaneously reset the rhythmic movements of both hands, but the effect on the contralateral hand was less and the effect on the ipsilateral hand was more compared with the unimanual tasks. Similar effects were seen from right and left hemisphere stimulation. TMS had little effect on the bimanual antiphase task. The equal effect of right and left hemisphere stimulation indicates that neither motor cortex is dominant for simple bimanual in-phase movement. The smaller influence of contralateral stimulation and the greater effect of ipsilateral stimulation during bimanual in-phase movement compared with unimanual movement suggest hemispheric coupling. The antiphase movements were resistant to TMS disruption, and this suggests that control of rhythm differs in the 2 tasks. TMS produced a transient asynchrony of movements on the 2 sides, indicating that both motor cortices might be downstream of the clocking command or that the clocking is a consequence of the 2 hemispheres communicating equally with each other.
对运动皮层进行经颅磁刺激(TMS)可中断对侧肢体的自主节律性运动。本研究采用“重置指数”(RI)方法,探究TMS对不同类型双手运动的影响。6名正常受试者参与研究。对于单手运动,每位受试者以舒适的频率轻敲右手或左手食指。对于双手运动,双手食指以相同(同相)方向或相反(反相)方向轻敲。分别以0.5至1.5倍运动阈值(MT)的不同强度对每个半球施加TMS。通过RI对节律的TMS中断进行量化。对于单手运动,TMS会干扰对侧和同侧的节律性手部运动,尽管对同侧手的影响要小得多。对于双手同相任务,TMS可同时重置双手的节律性运动,但与单手任务相比,对侧手的影响较小,同侧手的影响较大。左右半球刺激均观察到类似效果。TMS对双手反相任务影响很小。左右半球刺激效果相同表明,在简单的双手同相运动中,两个运动皮层均无主导作用。与单手运动相比,双手同相运动期间对侧刺激影响较小,同侧刺激影响较大,这表明存在半球耦合。反相运动对TMS干扰具有抗性,这表明两种任务中的节律控制有所不同。TMS在两侧产生了短暂的运动异步,这表明两个运动皮层可能都位于计时指令的下游,或者计时是两个半球相互平等交流的结果。