Hanson Kara
Health Policy Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Aug;71(2 Suppl):168-73.
There has been high profile advocacy and debate about how to increase availability and uptake of effective malaria control interventions. Application of the tools of public economics indicates that market failures occur for a number of effective malaria control interventions due to monopoly, externalities, and information failures, implying a role for public action. However, additional analysis is required to determine the optimal form of public intervention, and how to set priorities. Additional criteria of cost-effectiveness, impact on poverty and catastrophic expenditures, affordability, characteristics of supply and demand, and potential for leakage are invoked to help inform decision making in the field of malaria control policies. Particular emphasis is placed on the connections between public and private actions.
关于如何提高有效疟疾控制干预措施的可及性和使用率,一直存在备受瞩目的倡导和争论。公共经济学工具的应用表明,由于垄断、外部性和信息失灵,一些有效的疟疾控制干预措施存在市场失灵,这意味着公共行动可以发挥作用。然而,需要进一步分析以确定公共干预的最佳形式以及如何确定优先事项。成本效益、对贫困和灾难性支出的影响、可承受性、供需特征以及渗漏可能性等额外标准被用来为疟疾控制政策领域的决策提供参考。特别强调公共行动与私人行动之间的联系。