Suppr超能文献

内镜医师在上消化道超声内镜检查中使用丙泊酚是安全有效的:一项针对500例患者的前瞻性研究。

Endoscopist administered propofol for upper-GI EUS is safe and effective: a prospective study in 500 patients.

作者信息

Yusoff Ian F, Raymond Ginette, Sahai Anand V

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal-Hôpital Saint Luc, 1058 Rue St. Denis, Montréal, Québec H2X 3J4, Canada.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Sep;60(3):356-60. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)01711-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The administration of propofol for endoscopic sedation by a qualified person, other than the endoscopist, is safe and effective. The aim of this study was to determine if propofol can be administered safely and effectively by the endoscopist performing the procedure.

METHODS

All patients referred for upper-GI EUS were eligible for inclusion in the study. Exclusion criteria included the following: age less than 18 years, American Society of Anesthesiology physical status class greater than 2, a potential for difficulty in airway maintenance, and allergy to propofol constituents. The endoscopist administered propofol as an intravenous bolus followed by a constant infusion. Adverse events, drug dosage, complications, and patient/endoscopist satisfaction were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 500 patients (285 women, 215 men; mean age 53.4 [14.8 years]) were enrolled. Mean propofol dose was 301 mg (range 100-1000 mg). Mean procedure time was 19 minutes (range 3-70 minutes). The required examination was completed in all cases. There was no major adverse event. Oxygen desaturation (oxygen saturation < 95%) occurred in 16 (3%) patients. There were 4 (1%) cases of mild hypoxemia (saturation < 90%) but no case of severe hypoxemia (saturation <85%). The endoscopist rated the 92% of the procedures as "very smooth" or "smooth" and regarded administration of propofol as "easy" for 92%. All patients said they would prefer the same method of sedation if the procedure were repeated.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopist-administered propofol is safe and effective in selected patients.

摘要

背景

由非内镜医师的合格人员进行丙泊酚用于内镜检查镇静是安全有效的。本研究的目的是确定进行操作的内镜医师给予丙泊酚是否安全有效。

方法

所有转诊进行上消化道超声内镜检查的患者均符合纳入本研究的条件。排除标准包括:年龄小于18岁、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级大于2级、气道维持存在潜在困难以及对丙泊酚成分过敏。内镜医师静脉推注丙泊酚,随后持续输注。记录不良事件、药物剂量、并发症以及患者/内镜医师的满意度。

结果

共纳入500例患者(285例女性,215例男性;平均年龄53.4[14.8岁])。丙泊酚平均剂量为301mg(范围100 - 1000mg)。平均操作时间为19分钟(范围3 - 70分钟)。所有病例均完成了所需检查。未发生重大不良事件。16例(3%)患者出现氧饱和度降低(氧饱和度<95%)。有4例(1%)轻度低氧血症(饱和度<90%)病例,但无严重低氧血症(饱和度<85%)病例。内镜医师将92%的操作评为“非常顺利”或“顺利”,并认为92%的丙泊酚给药“容易”。所有患者表示如果重复该操作,他们更倾向于相同的镇静方法。

结论

内镜医师给予丙泊酚在选定患者中是安全有效的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验