• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机辅助下的上消化道内镜和结肠镜检查的个体化镇静:一项对比、多中心随机研究。

Computer-assisted personalized sedation for upper endoscopy and colonoscopy: a comparative, multicenter randomized study.

机构信息

Charlottesville Medical Research and Charlottesville Gastroenterology Associates, 325 Winding River Lane, Suite 102, Charlottesville, VA 22911, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Apr;73(4):765-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.031. Epub 2010 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.031
PMID:21168841
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The SEDASYS System is an investigational computer-assisted personalized sedation system integrating propofol delivery with patient monitoring to enable endoscopist/nurse teams to safely administer propofol.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and effectiveness of the SEDASYS System to the current standard of care for sedation during routine endoscopic procedures.

DESIGN

Nonblinded multicenter randomized comparative study.

SETTING

Four ambulatory surgery centers, 3 endoscopy centers, and 1 academic center in the United States.

PATIENTS

One thousand American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I to III adults undergoing routine colonoscopy or EGD.

INTERVENTIONS

Sedation with the SEDASYS System (SED) and sedation with each site's current standard of care (CSC; benzodiazepine/opioid combination).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Area under the curve of oxygen desaturation was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included patient satisfaction, clinician satisfaction, level of sedation, and patient recovery time.

RESULTS

Four hundred ninety-six patients were randomized to SED and 504 to CSC. Area under the curve of oxygen desaturation was significantly lower for SED (23.6 s·%) than for CSC (88.0 s·%; P = .028). Patients were predominately minimally to moderately sedated in both groups. SED patients were significantly more satisfied than CSC patients (P = .007). Clinician satisfaction was greater with SED than with CSC (P < .001). SED patients recovered faster than CSC patients (P < .001). The incidence of adverse events was 5.8% in the SED group and 8.7% in the CSC group.

LIMITATIONS

Nonblinded.

CONCLUSIONS

The SEDASYS System could provide endoscopist/nurse teams a safe and effective on-label means to administer propofol to effect minimal to moderate sedation during routine colonoscopy and EGD.

摘要

背景

SEDASYS 系统是一种研究性的计算机辅助个性化镇静系统,它将丙泊酚输注与患者监测相结合,使内镜医师/护士团队能够安全地给予丙泊酚。

目的

比较 SEDASYS 系统与常规内镜检查镇静的当前标准护理的安全性和有效性。

设计

非盲多中心随机对照研究。

设置

美国的四个门诊手术中心、三个内镜中心和一个学术中心。

患者

1000 名美国麻醉医师协会身体状况 I 至 III 级的成年人,接受常规结肠镜检查或 EGD。

干预措施

SEDASYS 系统镇静(SED)和各中心当前标准护理(CSC;苯二氮䓬/阿片类药物联合)镇静。

主要观察指标

氧饱和度下降曲线下面积是主要终点。次要终点包括患者满意度、临床医生满意度、镇静水平和患者恢复时间。

结果

496 名患者被随机分配至 SED 组,504 名患者被随机分配至 CSC 组。SED 的氧饱和度下降曲线下面积明显低于 CSC(23.6 s·% 比 88.0 s·%;P =.028)。两组患者的镇静程度均为轻度至中度。SED 组患者明显比 CSC 组患者更满意(P =.007)。SED 组的临床医生满意度明显高于 CSC 组(P <.001)。SED 组患者的恢复速度明显快于 CSC 组(P <.001)。SED 组的不良事件发生率为 5.8%,CSC 组为 8.7%。

局限性

非盲。

结论

SEDASYS 系统为内镜医师/护士团队提供了一种安全有效的标签内手段,可在常规结肠镜检查和 EGD 中给予丙泊酚,以实现轻度至中度镇静。

相似文献

1
Computer-assisted personalized sedation for upper endoscopy and colonoscopy: a comparative, multicenter randomized study.计算机辅助下的上消化道内镜和结肠镜检查的个体化镇静:一项对比、多中心随机研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Apr;73(4):765-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.031. Epub 2010 Dec 18.
2
An assessment of computer-assisted personalized sedation: a sedation delivery system to administer propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy.计算机辅助个性化镇静评估:一种用于胃肠内镜检查中输注丙泊酚的镇静给药系统。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Sep;68(3):542-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.011. Epub 2008 Jun 3.
3
The debate for nonanesthesiologist-administered propofol sedation in endoscopy rages on: who will be the "King of Prop?".关于非麻醉医生在内镜检查中给予丙泊酚镇静的争论仍在激烈进行:谁将成为“丙泊酚之王”?
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Apr;73(4):773-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.11.041.
4
Propofol sedation alone or in combination with pharyngeal lidocaine anesthesia for routine upper GI endoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial.丙泊酚镇静单独或联合咽部利多卡因麻醉用于常规上消化道内镜检查:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、非劣效性试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Dec;74(6):1207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.072. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
5
Propofol sedation during endoscopic procedures: how much staff and monitoring are necessary?内镜检查过程中的丙泊酚镇静:需要多少工作人员和监测?
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Sep;66(3):443-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.01.037.
6
The SEDASYS System is not intended for the sedation of high-risk patients.SEDASYS系统不适用于对高危患者进行镇静。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Sep;74(3):723. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.024.
7
The First US Clinical Experience With Computer-Assisted Propofol Sedation: A Retrospective Observational Comparative Study on Efficacy, Safety, Efficiency, and Endoscopist and Patient Satisfaction.美国首例计算机辅助丙泊酚镇静临床经验:一项关于疗效、安全性、效率以及内镜医师和患者满意度的回顾性观察比较研究
Anesth Analg. 2017 Sep;125(3):804-811. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001898.
8
Efficacy of bispectral monitoring as an adjunct to nurse-administered propofol sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.双谱监测辅助护士给予丙泊酚镇静用于结肠镜检查的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Sep;101(9):2003-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00806.x.
9
Nurse-administered propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for upper endoscopy in cirrhotic patients.护士给予丙泊酚与咪达唑仑和哌替啶用于肝硬化患者上消化道内镜检查的比较
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Nov;98(11):2440-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.08668.x.
10
Low-dose propofol sedation for diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy: results in 10,662 adults.低剂量丙泊酚镇静用于诊断性食管胃十二指肠镜检查:10662例成年人的结果
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul;104(7):1650-5. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.250. Epub 2009 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Remimazolam and Its Place in the Current Landscape of Procedural Sedation and General Anesthesia.瑞马唑仑及其在当前程序性镇静和全身麻醉领域中的地位。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 25;13(15):4362. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154362.
2
Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy: Umbrella Review.人工智能在内镜检查中的诊断准确性:综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Jul 15;12:e56361. doi: 10.2196/56361.
3
Pharmacokinetics of Nasal Esketamine in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis with and Without Nasal Decongestant Pretreatment and in Healthy Subjects with and Without Nasal Corticosteroid Pretreatment.
鼻用依他佐辛在伴有或不伴有鼻用减充血剂预处理的变应性鼻炎患者和伴有或不伴有鼻用皮质类固醇预处理的健康受试者中的药代动力学。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023 Sep;62(9):1315-1328. doi: 10.1007/s40262-023-01273-z. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
4
Evaluating the effect of an artificial intelligence system on the anesthesia quality control during gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation: a randomized controlled trial.评价人工智能系统对镇静下胃肠镜检查麻醉质量控制的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Oct 7;22(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01796-1.
5
Efficacy and safety of fixed doses of intranasal Esketamine as an add-on therapy to Oral antidepressants in Japanese patients with treatment-resistant depression: a phase 2b randomized clinical study.鼻腔内依他佐辛固定剂量作为口服抗抑郁药附加治疗对日本治疗抵抗性抑郁症患者的疗效和安全性:一项 2b 期随机临床研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 25;21(1):526. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03538-y.
6
Autonomous Nervous Response During Sedation in Colonoscopy and the Relationship With Clinician Satisfaction.结肠镜检查镇静期间的自主神经反应及其与临床医生满意度的关系。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 16;8:643158. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.643158. eCollection 2021.
7
Medical, Political, and Economic Considerations for the Use of MAC for Endoscopic Sedation: Big Price, Little Justification?使用 MAC 进行内镜镇静的医学、政治和经济考虑:高价格,低理由?
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Sep;65(9):2466-2472. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06464-3.
8
[Effects of remifentanil on awakening of propofol sedated patients submitted to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized clinical trial].[瑞芬太尼对接受上消化道内镜检查的丙泊酚镇静患者苏醒的影响:一项随机临床试验]
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2020 May-Jun;70(3):262-270. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 May 12.
9
Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Open Posterior Lumbar Surgery.双侧竖脊肌平面阻滞用于开放性腰椎后路手术。
J Pain Res. 2020 Apr 5;13:709-717. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S248171. eCollection 2020.
10
Results from the Adverse Event Sedation Reporting Tool: A Global Anthology of 7952 Records Derived from >160,000 Procedural Sedation Encounters.不良事件镇静报告工具的结果:来自超过160,000例程序性镇静记录的7952条记录的全球选集。
J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 1;8(12):2087. doi: 10.3390/jcm8122087.