Margolin Frederick R, Kaufman Lauren, Jacobs Richard P, Denny Susan R, Schrumpf John D
Breast Health Center, California Pacific Medical Center, 3698 California St, Suite 2F, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA.
Radiology. 2004 Oct;233(1):251-4. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2331031680. Epub 2004 Aug 27.
To retrospectively compare core biopsy diagnosis with final diagnosis at surgical excision in cores with and cores without calcification on specimen radiographs.
One hundred thirteen consecutive patients underwent vacuum-assisted 11- or 14-gauge needle stereotactic core biopsy for calcifications with malignant histologic results in core samples from 116 lesions. For each lesion, calcification was identified in at least one core at specimen radiography. Cores with and those without calcification seen on magnified specimen radiographs were separately submitted to and reported on by pathologists, who obtained additional levels in cores with calcification. All patients underwent surgical excision of the lesion area within 7 weeks. The pathologic diagnosis in core samples with and those without calcification on specimen radiographs was compared with final diagnosis at surgical excision. Fisher exact test was used for all chi(2) determinations of statistical significance.
Cores with calcification on specimen radiographs were more likely to enable a final diagnosis of malignancy than were cores without calcification (98 [84%] vs 82 [71%] of 116; P =.02). Cores without calcification were significantly more likely to cause a diagnosis of cancer to be missed than were those with calcification on specimen radiographs (13 [11%] vs one [1%] of 116; P <.001). Underestimates of malignancy were more frequent in 14- than in 11-gauge specimens (11 [18%] of 60 vs six [10%] of 56; P =.30). Regardless of needle size, there was no significant difference in underestimation of malignancy between cores with and without radiographically evident calcification (17 [15%] vs 21 [18%] of 116; P =.60).
Specimen radiography is essential to document calcification retrieval. Cores without radiographically demonstrated calcification may fail to show a malignant lesion. Separate identification of calcium-containing cores may assist the pathologist, who can more thoroughly evaluate these cores with additional levels of section.
回顾性比较在标本射线照片上有钙化和无钙化的芯针活检诊断结果与手术切除时的最终诊断结果。
113例连续患者接受了真空辅助11或14号针立体定向芯针活检,用于对钙化灶进行活检,116个病灶的芯针样本组织学结果为恶性。对于每个病灶,在标本射线照片上至少有一个芯针中发现钙化。在放大的标本射线照片上有钙化和无钙化的芯针分别送病理科医生并由其报告,对有钙化的芯针制作额外切片。所有患者在7周内对病灶区域进行了手术切除。将标本射线照片上有钙化和无钙化的芯针样本病理诊断结果与手术切除时的最终诊断结果进行比较。所有卡方检验均采用Fisher精确检验来确定统计学显著性。
标本射线照片上有钙化的芯针比无钙化的芯针更有可能最终诊断为恶性(116个病灶中分别为98个[84%]和82个[71%];P = 0.02)。标本射线照片上无钙化的芯针比有钙化的芯针更有可能漏诊癌症(116个病灶中分别为13个[11%]和1个[1%];P < 0.001)。14号针标本中恶性程度低估情况比11号针标本更常见(60个中有11个[18%],56个中有6个[10%];P = 0.30)。无论针的大小如何,标本射线照片上有钙化和无钙化的芯针在恶性程度低估方面无显著差异(116个病灶中分别为17个[15%]和21个[18%];P = 0.60)。
标本射线照片对于记录钙化灶的取出情况至关重要。标本射线照片未显示钙化的芯针可能无法显示恶性病变。单独识别含钙化的芯针可能有助于病理科医生,其可以通过制作额外切片更全面地评估这些芯针。