Nylenna Magne, Hansen Arild Skaug, Storeng Anne Britt, Westin Steinar
Det medisinske fakultet, Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet, 7489 Trondheim.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2004 Aug 26;124(16):2088-90.
In contrast to research and teaching duties, the obligation to disseminate research results to the general public is poorly described and not lived up to in academic medicine. At the Norwegian University of Science and Technology's Faculty of Medicine, an interdisciplinary group met with academics to discuss and identify means for improvements. The academics reported positive attitudes to popularising and communicating their findings. Dissemination of research as a working area was, however, characterised as fragmented, incidental and too much dependent on individual enthusiasm. The most important initiatives in order to achieve better dissemination were said to be the following: more and better training in popularization and dealing with the media; development of an infrastructure for dissemination at a decentralised institutional level (defined responsibility, routines etc.); and encouragement of good presentations by making dissemination of research meritorious.
与研究和教学职责形成对比的是,向公众传播研究成果的义务在学术医学领域中描述甚少,也未得到切实履行。在挪威科技大学医学院,一个跨学科小组与学者们会面,讨论并确定改进方法。学者们对推广和交流他们的研究结果持积极态度。然而,作为一个工作领域,研究成果的传播被描述为零散、偶然且过于依赖个人热情。为了实现更好的传播,最重要的举措如下:在推广和应对媒体方面进行更多、更好的培训;在分散的机构层面建立传播基础设施(明确责任、流程等);通过使研究传播值得称赞来鼓励进行精彩的展示。