Pencharz James N, MacLean Catherine H
Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Aug 15;51(4):538-48. doi: 10.1002/art.20521.
To develop a comprehensive set of explicit process measures to assess the quality of health care for osteoarthritis and to describe the scientific evidence that supports each measure.
Through a comprehensive literature review, we developed potential quality measures and a summary of existing data to support or refute the relationship between the processes of care proposed in the indicators and relevant clinical outcomes. The proposed measures and literature summary were presented to a multidisciplinary panel of experts in arthritis and pain. The panel rated each proposed measure for its validity as a measure of health care quality.
Among 22 measures proposed for osteoarthritis, the expert panel rated 14 as valid measures of health care quality.
Sufficient scientific evidence and expert consensus exist to support a comprehensive set of measures to assess the quality of heath care for osteoarthritis. These measures can be used to gain an understanding of the quality of care for patients with osteoarthritis.
制定一套全面的明确过程指标,以评估骨关节炎的医疗质量,并描述支持每项指标的科学证据。
通过全面的文献综述,我们制定了潜在的质量指标以及现有数据的总结,以支持或反驳指标中提出的护理过程与相关临床结果之间的关系。将提议的指标和文献总结提交给关节炎和疼痛领域的多学科专家小组。该小组对每项提议的指标作为医疗质量指标的有效性进行评分。
在为骨关节炎提议的22项指标中,专家小组将其中14项评为有效的医疗质量指标。
有足够的科学证据和专家共识来支持一套全面的指标,以评估骨关节炎的医疗质量。这些指标可用于了解骨关节炎患者的护理质量。