Saint Louis Veterans Administration (VA), Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri 63141, USA.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Aug;8(8):709-17. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.03.028. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cirrhosis is a prevalent and expensive condition. With an increasing emphasis on quality in health care and recognition of inconsistencies in the management of patients with cirrhosis, we established a set of explicit quality indicators (QIs) for their treatment.
We organized an 11-member, multidisciplinary expert panel and followed modified Delphi methods to systematically identify a set of QIs for cirrhosis. We provided the panel with a report that summarized the results of a comprehensive literature review of data linking candidate QIs to outcomes. The panel performed independent ratings of each candidate QI by using a standard 9-point RAND appropriateness scale (RAS) (ranging from 1 = not appropriate to 9 = most appropriate). The panel members then met, reviewed the ratings, and voted again by using an iterative process of discussion. The final set of QIs was selected; QIs had a median RAS >7, and panel members agreed on those selected.
Among 169 candidate QIs, the panel rated 41 QIs as valid measures of quality care. The selected QIs cover 6 domains of care including ascites (13 QIs), variceal bleeding (18 QIs), hepatic encephalopathy (4 QIs), hepatocellular cancer (1 QI), liver transplantation (2 QIs), and general cirrhosis care (3 QIs). Content coverage included prevention, diagnosis, treatment, timeliness, and follow-up.
We developed an explicit set of evidence-based QIs for treatment of cirrhosis. These provide physicians and institutions with a tool to identify processes amenable to quality improvement. This tool is intended to be applicable in any setting where care for patients with cirrhosis is provided.
肝硬化是一种常见且昂贵的疾病。随着医疗保健质量的日益重视以及对肝硬化患者管理不一致性的认识,我们为其治疗制定了一套明确的质量指标(QI)。
我们组织了一个由 11 名成员组成的多学科专家小组,并采用改良 Delphi 方法系统地确定了一套肝硬化治疗的 QI。我们向小组提供了一份报告,总结了综合文献综述的结果,该综述将候选 QI 与结局联系起来。小组使用标准的 9 分 RAND 适宜性量表(RAS)(范围从 1 = 不适当到 9 = 最适当)对每个候选 QI 进行独立评分。然后,小组成员通过讨论的迭代过程进行了审议并再次投票。选择了最终的 QI 集;QI 的中位数 RAS >7,小组成员对所选 QI 达成一致。
在 169 个候选 QI 中,小组将 41 个 QI 评为质量护理的有效衡量标准。所选 QI 涵盖 6 个护理领域,包括腹水(13 个 QI)、静脉曲张出血(18 个 QI)、肝性脑病(4 个 QI)、肝细胞癌(1 个 QI)、肝移植(2 个 QI)和一般肝硬化护理(3 个 QI)。内容涵盖预防、诊断、治疗、及时性和随访。
我们制定了一套明确的基于证据的肝硬化治疗 QI。这些为医生和机构提供了一种工具,可用于确定可进行质量改进的流程。该工具旨在适用于提供肝硬化患者护理的任何环境。