Suppr超能文献

与布洛芬和塞来昔布相比,氯美昔布在骨关节炎患者中的胃十二指肠安全性和耐受性。

Gastroduodenal safety and tolerability of lumiracoxib compared with Ibuprofen and celecoxib in patients with osteoarthritis.

作者信息

Hawkey Christopher C, Svoboda Petr, Fiedorowicz-Fabrycy Irena F, Nasonov Evgeny L, Pikhlak Eduard G, Cousin Marc, Gitton Xavier, Hoexter Godehard

机构信息

University Hospital Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2004 Sep;31(9):1804-10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) treated with therapeutic doses of the novel COX-2 selective inhibitor, lumiracoxib (COX189, Prexige), and the standard nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) ibuprofen. The COX-2 selective inhibitor celecoxib was included as an active control.

METHODS

In this randomized, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study, eligible patients were randomized to receive lumiracoxib 200 mg (n = 264) or 400 mg (n = 260) once daily (qd), ibuprofen 800 mg (n = 260) 3 times daily (tid), or celecoxib 200 mg qd (n = 258) for 13 weeks. The incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers and erosions was determined by endoscopy prior to randomization, and after 4 weeks and 13 weeks of treatment (end of study). Frequencies of adverse events were also recorded.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers >/= 3 mm in diameter was significantly lower in the lumiracoxib groups (200 mg: 4.3%; 400 mg: 4.0%) than in the ibuprofen group (15.7%; p < 0.001) and similar to the celecoxib group (3.2%). In the ibuprofen group, a significantly greater number of patients (6.0%) had > 10 gastroduodenal erosions compared with lumiracoxib 200 mg (1.2%; p < 0.01), lumiracoxib 400 mg (1.6%; p < 0.05), and celecoxib (2.4%; p < 0.05). A greater number of patients in the ibuprofen group discontinued treatment due to an adverse event compared with both lumiracoxib groups and the celecoxib group.

CONCLUSION

In patients with OA, lumiracoxib 200 mg or 400 mg qd was associated with a significantly lower risk of gastroduodenal ulceration than ibuprofen 800 mg tid, and was similar to celecoxib 200 mg qd.

摘要

目的

比较新型COX-2选择性抑制剂鲁米昔布(COX189,Prexige)治疗剂量与标准非甾体抗炎药布洛芬治疗骨关节炎(OA)患者时胃十二指肠溃疡的发生率。将COX-2选择性抑制剂塞来昔布作为活性对照。

方法

在这项随机、多中心、双盲、平行组研究中,符合条件的患者被随机分为每日一次(qd)接受鲁米昔布200mg(n = 264)或400mg(n = 260)、每日三次(tid)接受布洛芬800mg(n = 260)或每日一次接受塞来昔布200mg(n = 258)治疗,疗程为13周。在随机分组前、治疗4周和13周(研究结束时)通过内镜检查确定胃十二指肠溃疡和糜烂的发生率。还记录不良事件的发生频率。

结果

鲁米昔布组(200mg:4.3%;400mg:4.0%)直径≥3mm的胃十二指肠溃疡累积发生率显著低于布洛芬组(15.7%;p < 0.001),与塞来昔布组(3.2%)相似。与鲁米昔布200mg组(1.2%;p < 0.01)、鲁米昔布400mg组(1.6%;p < 0.05)和塞来昔布组(2.4%;p < 0.05)相比,布洛芬组有更多患者(6.0%)出现>10处胃十二指肠糜烂。与鲁米昔布组和塞来昔布组相比,布洛芬组因不良事件停药的患者更多。

结论

在OA患者中,每日一次服用鲁米昔布200mg或400mg导致胃十二指肠溃疡的风险显著低于每日三次服用布洛芬800mg,且与每日一次服用塞来昔布200mg相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验