van Der Boom Hannerieke, Philipsen Hans, Stevens Fred
Capaciteitgroep zorgwetenschappen, sectie medische sociologie, Universiteit Maastricht, postbus 616, 6200 MD Maastricht.
Gewina. 2004;27(2):100-19.
This article describes home nursing in the Netherlands between 1950 and 2004. The developments in this period are described form the theoretical perspective on professions of Andrew Abbott: 'professions are exclusive occupational groups applying somewhat abstract knowledge to particular cases'. In 1950, home nursing was an all-round profession providing home nursing care and preventive care to all categories of patients, mainly in their own homes. It was - and still is - a profession situated in the 'periphery' of the health care system, where care and support to patients with pain, suffering and disabilities because of age or chronic illness are considered as belonging to a separate task domain, relatively independent of the mainly curative activities that are performed in the 'medical centre' of health care, especially in the academic hospitals. Typical compared to other countries is that an extensive network of private initiatives, in the form of Cross Organisations of different denominational signatures, existed in the Netherlands until 1990, covering the whole country with home nursing services. In that year, the provision of home nursing and home help were integrated and most home nursing organisations merged into large, regional home care organisations. In this article, six main social developments are described, that influenced the development of home nursing and resulted in the profession as it is now: a differentiated profession divided into different levels of care, working in an organisational, largely bureaucratic setting of home care organisations, where managers and external regional assessment organisations (RIO's) decide on the care to be provided. They now find themselves in a transmural setting, where boundaries between different forms of care no longer exist, and co-operation with other professionals, such as home helps, specialist nurses, GPs, and hospital physicians, is frequent. Currently, their professional autonomy and independent decision-making regarding diagnosis and therapy is affected, and elements of bureaucratisation and managementism (for example aspects such as time-writing) affect their daily work. However, home nursing can still be characterised as a relatively exclusive and independent profession, solving particular cases in the homes of patients by performing activities that are based on abstract, methodical knowledge.
本文描述了1950年至2004年间荷兰的家庭护理情况。这一时期的发展是从安德鲁·阿博特的职业理论视角进行描述的:“职业是将某种抽象知识应用于特定案例的排他性职业群体”。1950年,家庭护理是一项全方位的职业,主要在患者家中为各类患者提供家庭护理和预防护理。它过去是——现在仍然是——一个处于医疗保健系统“边缘”的职业,在这里,对因年龄或慢性病而疼痛、受苦和残疾的患者的护理和支持被视为属于一个单独的任务领域,相对独立于在医疗保健“医疗中心”,特别是在学术医院进行的主要治疗活动。与其他国家相比,典型的情况是,直到1990年,荷兰存在一个广泛的私人倡议网络,以不同教派签名的交叉组织形式存在,为全国提供家庭护理服务。同年,家庭护理和家政服务的提供进行了整合,大多数家庭护理组织合并为大型的地区性家庭护理组织。本文描述了影响家庭护理发展并导致其成为如今这样一种职业的六个主要社会发展情况:一个分化为不同护理层次的职业,在家庭护理组织的组织性、很大程度上官僚化的环境中工作,经理和外部地区评估组织(RIO)决定提供何种护理。他们现在处于一种跨领域的环境中,不同护理形式之间的界限不再存在,并且与其他专业人员,如家政服务人员、专科护士、全科医生和医院医生的合作频繁。目前,他们在诊断和治疗方面的职业自主性和独立决策受到影响,官僚化和管理主义的因素(例如写时间记录等方面)影响他们的日常工作。然而,家庭护理仍然可以被描述为一个相对排他和独立的职业,通过基于抽象、有条理的知识开展活动,在患者家中解决特定案例。