Xu Yin, Wahner Andrea E, Nguyen Phuong L
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, USA.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004 Sep;128(9):980-5. doi: 10.5858/2004-128-980-POCMLT.
Previous investigators have reported discrepancies between hematologic, marrow morphologic, and cytogenetic responses to imatinib mesylate among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In addition to disease refractoriness, rare instances of disease progression from chronic phase to blast crisis during imatinib therapy have recently been anecdotally reported.
To describe the clinicopathologic features of 3 patients with CML who rapidly progressed from chronic phase to blast crisis while taking imatinib and to perform a review of the literature.
Morphologic, immunophenotypic, and cytogenetic analyses were performed on the 3 patients at the time of initial diagnosis, during imatinib therapy, and at blast crisis.
The 3 patients were men, aged 39, 42, and 43 years. Two had been treated with hydroxyurea for 16 and 21 months before imatinib therapy, while 1 was started on a regimen of imatinib following diagnosis. Despite a hematologic response in all 3 patients, none of them achieved cytogenetic remission, and all progressed to blast crisis at 7 to 10 months of imatinib therapy. Blood findings during blast transformation were heterogeneous, including normal blood morphologic findings in 1 patient, leukocytosis with circulating blasts and basophilia in 1, and marked pancytopenia in 1. All 3 marrow specimens demonstrated moderate to marked diffuse reticulin fibrosis with more than 20% blasts. Clonal cytogenetic evolution was evident in 2 of the 3 patients and included an extra Philadelphia chromosome in both. All 3 patients underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. One was alive with no evidence of disease at 14 month follow-up, while 2 had residual disease after bone marrow transplantation and died of complications at 4 and 5 months after transplantation.
Blood data did not always reflect marrow status. Therefore, bone marrow follow-up is critical for monitoring of response. Our findings suggest that significant progression of marrow reticulin fibrosis during imatinib therapy can be an indicator for a return or progression of CML and, in some patients with CML, imatinib may promote cytogenetic clonal evolution, resulting in a poor response to treatment.
既往研究人员报告了慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)患者对甲磺酸伊马替尼的血液学、骨髓形态学和细胞遗传学反应存在差异。除疾病难治性外,近期有个案报道了在伊马替尼治疗期间罕见的疾病从慢性期进展为急变期的情况。
描述3例CML患者在服用伊马替尼期间迅速从慢性期进展为急变期的临床病理特征,并对文献进行综述。
对3例患者在初诊时、伊马替尼治疗期间和急变期进行形态学、免疫表型和细胞遗传学分析。
3例患者均为男性,年龄分别为39岁、42岁和43岁。2例在伊马替尼治疗前分别接受羟基脲治疗16个月和21个月,1例在诊断后开始伊马替尼治疗方案。尽管3例患者均有血液学反应,但均未达到细胞遗传学缓解,且在伊马替尼治疗7至10个月时均进展为急变期。急变期的血液学表现各异,1例患者血液形态学正常,1例白细胞增多伴循环原始细胞和嗜碱性粒细胞增多,1例全血细胞显著减少。所有3例骨髓标本均显示中度至显著弥漫性网硬蛋白纤维化,原始细胞超过20%。3例患者中有2例出现克隆性细胞遗传学演变,均包括额外的费城染色体。所有3例患者均接受了异基因骨髓移植。1例在随访14个月时无疾病证据存活,2例骨髓移植后有残留疾病,分别在移植后4个月和5个月死于并发症。
血液数据并不总是反映骨髓状态。因此,骨髓随访对于监测反应至关重要。我们的研究结果表明,伊马替尼治疗期间骨髓网硬蛋白纤维化的显著进展可能是CML复发或进展的一个指标,并且在一些CML患者中,伊马替尼可能促进细胞遗传学克隆演变,导致治疗反应不佳。