Worst practices used in conducting FMEA projects. Part 1 of a 2-part series.
作者信息
Spath Patrice
机构信息
Brown-Spath & Associates, Forest Grove, OR, USA.
出版信息
Hosp Peer Rev. 2004 Aug;29(8):114-6.
PMID:15338826
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Worst practices used in conducting FMEA projects. Part 1 of a 2-part series.
Hosp Peer Rev. 2004 Aug;29(8):114-6.
2
Worst practices used in conducting FMEA projects. Part 2 of a two-part series.
Hosp Peer Rev. 2004 Sep;29(9):129-31.
3
Put patient safety process changes to the test.
Hosp Peer Rev. 2001 Dec;26(12):173-6, 161.
4
Systems approach helps PA hospital improve patient safety.
Perform Improv Advis. 2003 Oct;7(10):129-32.
5
To err is human: improving patient safety through failure mode and effect analysis.
Clin Leadersh Manag Rev. 2004 Jan-Feb;18(1):32-6.
6
Revisions to the sentinel event policy.
Jt Comm Perspect. 2005 Oct;25(10):4-6, 11.
7
FMEA (failure mode analysis): a new QI tool to help improve case management processes.
Hosp Case Manag. 2003 Mar;11(3):33-6.
8
Minnesota takes extra steps on wrong surgery, retained items.
OR Manager. 2005 Apr;21(4):1, 18-20.
9
Process improvement integrated with patient safety initiatives.
Perform Improv Advis. 2003 Jan;1(1):7-12.
10
QI experts say 'automatic' handoffs could cause errors.
Hosp Case Manag. 2006 Feb;14(2):24-6.
引用本文的文献
1
Failure mode and effects analysis outputs: are they valid?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun 10;12:150. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-150.
Zotero 插件