Borrell Luisa N, Taylor George W, Borgnakke Wenche S, Woolfolk Marilyn W, Nyquist Linda V
Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004 Oct;32(5):363-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00177.x.
This study investigates the independent and joint effects of family income and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) on general health and oral health before and after controlling for traditional risk factors in a representative sample of adults aged 18+ years residing in the Detroit tri-county area, Michigan.
Individuals data were obtained through interviews, while neighborhood data came from the 1990 US Census. SUDAAN was used to accommodate the complex sampling design and correlation of outcomes within the same neighborhoods.
Whites in disadvantaged neighborhoods were four times more likely to rate their oral health as fair or poor [odds ratio (OR): 4.0; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.6-10.3] than their counterparts in advantaged neighborhoods. When evaluating the joint effects of family income and neighborhood SES, low-income Whites in disadvantaged neighborhoods were six times more likely to rate their oral health as fair or poor (OR: 6.4; 95% CI: 1.6-26.5) than their high-income counterparts in advantaged neighborhoods. The odds of rating general health as fair or poor was six times greater in low-income African Americans in disadvantaged neighborhoods (OR: 6.1; 95% CI: 1.6-23.8) than high-income African Americans in advantaged neighborhoods. Similarly, low-income African Americans in disadvantaged neighborhoods were almost three times (OR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.0-8.1) more likely to rate their oral health as fair/poor than high-income African Americans in advantaged neighborhoods.
SES conditions at the neighborhood-level, independently or jointly with individual-level income, appear to be important in evaluating racial/ethnic differences in self-rated oral health. Neighborhood conditions could tap into constructs not captured by individual-level variables on self-rated oral health.
本研究调查了家庭收入和邻里社会经济地位(SES)对密歇根州底特律三县地区18岁及以上成年人代表性样本的总体健康和口腔健康的独立影响和联合影响,同时控制了传统风险因素。
个体数据通过访谈获得,而邻里数据来自1990年美国人口普查。使用SUDAAN来适应复杂的抽样设计以及同一邻里内结果的相关性。
处于弱势邻里的白人将其口腔健康评为一般或较差的可能性是处于优势邻里的白人的四倍[优势比(OR):4.0;95%置信区间(CI):1.6 - 10.3]。在评估家庭收入和邻里SES的联合影响时,处于弱势邻里的低收入白人将其口腔健康评为一般或较差的可能性是处于优势邻里的高收入白人的六倍(OR:6.4;95% CI:1.6 - 26.5)。处于弱势邻里的低收入非裔美国人将总体健康评为一般或较差的几率是处于优势邻里的高收入非裔美国人的六倍(OR:6.1;95% CI:1.6 - 23.8)。同样,处于弱势邻里的低收入非裔美国人将其口腔健康评为一般/较差的可能性几乎是处于优势邻里的高收入非裔美国人的三倍(OR:2.8;95% CI:1.0 - 8.1)。
邻里层面的SES状况,无论是独立的还是与个体层面的收入联合起来,在评估自评口腔健康的种族/民族差异方面似乎都很重要。邻里状况可能涉及到自评口腔健康的个体层面变量未涵盖的因素。