Finer Neil N, Carlo Waldemar A, Duara Shahnaz, Fanaroff Avroy A, Donovan Edward F, Wright Linda L, Kandefer Sarah, Poole W Kenneth
Department of Pediatrics, University of California, 200 W Arbor Dr, 8774, San Diego, CA 92103-8774, USA.
Pediatrics. 2004 Sep;114(3):651-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0394.
Although earlier studies have suggested that early continuous airway positive pressure (CPAP) may be beneficial in reducing ventilator dependence and subsequent chronic lung disease in the extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infant, the time of initiation of CPAP has varied, and there are no prospective studies of infants who have received CPAP or positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) from initial resuscitation in the delivery room (DR). Current practice for the ELBW infant includes early intubation and the administration of prophylactic surfactant, often in the DR. The feasibility of initiating CPAP in the DR and continuing this therapy without intubation for surfactant has never been determined prospectively in a population of ELBW infants. This study was designed to determine the feasibility of randomizing ELBW infants of <28 weeks' gestation to CPAP/PEEP or no CPAP/PEEP during resuscitation immediately after delivery, avoiding routine DR intubation for surfactant administration, initiating CPAP on neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and assessing compliance with subsequent intubation criteria.
Infants who were of <28 weeks' gestation, who were born in 5 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network NICUs from July 2002 to January 2003, and for whom a decision had been made to provide full treatment after birth were randomized to receive either CPAP/PEEP or not using a neonatal T-piece resuscitator (NeoPuff). Infants would not be intubated for the sole purpose of surfactant administration in the DR. After admission to the NICU, all nonintubated infants were placed on CPAP and were to be intubated for surfactant administration only after meeting specific criteria: a fraction of inspired oxygen of >0.3 with an oxygen saturation by pulse oximeter of <90% and/or an arterial oxygen pressure of <45 mm Hg, an arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide of >55 mm Hg, or apnea requiring bag and mask ventilation.
A total of 104 infants were enrolled over a 6-month period: 55 CPAP and 49 control infants. No infant was intubated in the DR for the exclusive purpose of surfactant administration. Forty-seven infants were intubated for resuscitation in the DR: 27 of 55 CPAP infants and 20 of 49 control infants. Only 4 of the 43 infants who had a birth weight of <700 g and 3 of the 37 infants of <25 weeks' gestation were resuscitated successfully without positive pressure ventilation, and no difference was observed between the treatment groups. All infants of 23 weeks' gestation required intubation in the DR, irrespective of treatment group, whereas only 3 (14%) of 21 infants of 27 weeks' required such intubation. For infants who were not intubated in the DR, 36 infants (16 CPAP infants and 20 control infants) were subsequently intubated in the NICU by day 7, in accordance with the protocol. Overall, 80% of studied infants required intubation within the first 7 days of life. The care provided for 52 (95%) of 55 CPAP infants and 43 (88%) of the 49 control infants was in compliance with the study protocol, with an overall compliance of 91%.
This study demonstrated that infants could be randomized successfully to a DR intervention of CPAP/PEEP compared with no CPAP/PEEP, with intubation provided only for resuscitation indications, and subsequent intubation for prespecified criteria. Forty-five percent (47 of 104) of infants <28 weeks' gestation required intubation for resuscitation in the DR. CPAP/PEEP in the DR did not affect the need for intubation at birth or during the subsequent week. Overall, 20% of infants did not need intubation by 7 days of life. This experience should be helpful in facilitating the design of subsequent prospective studies of ventilatory support in ELBW infants.
尽管早期研究表明,早期持续气道正压通气(CPAP)可能有助于降低极低出生体重(ELBW)婴儿对呼吸机的依赖以及后续慢性肺病的发生,但CPAP的起始时间各不相同,且尚无关于在产房(DR)初始复苏时即接受CPAP或呼气末正压通气(PEEP)的婴儿的前瞻性研究。目前针对ELBW婴儿的做法包括早期插管和预防性使用表面活性剂,常在产房进行。在ELBW婴儿群体中,于产房开始使用CPAP并在不插管的情况下持续这种治疗以避免使用表面活性剂的可行性从未经过前瞻性研究确定。本研究旨在确定将孕周<28周的ELBW婴儿在出生后立即复苏期间随机分为接受CPAP/PEEP或不接受CPAP/PEEP的可行性,避免在产房常规插管以给予表面活性剂,在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院时开始使用CPAP,并评估对后续插管标准的依从性。
2002年7月至2003年1月在5个美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所新生儿研究网络NICU出生的孕周<28周、出生后已决定给予充分治疗的婴儿,使用新生儿T形复苏器(NeoPuff)随机分为接受CPAP/PEEP或不接受CPAP/PEEP。婴儿不会仅为在产房给予表面活性剂而插管。入住NICU后,所有未插管的婴儿均给予CPAP,且仅在符合特定标准后才插管给予表面活性剂:吸入氧分数>0.3且经脉搏血氧饱和度仪测得的氧饱和度<90%和/或动脉血氧分压<45 mmHg、动脉血二氧化碳分压>55 mmHg,或需要面罩气囊通气的呼吸暂停。
在6个月期间共纳入104例婴儿:55例CPAP组婴儿和49例对照组婴儿。没有婴儿仅为在产房给予表面活性剂而插管。47例婴儿在产房因复苏而插管:55例CPAP组婴儿中有27例,49例对照组婴儿中有20例。出生体重<700 g的43例婴儿中只有4例、孕周<25周的37例婴儿中只有3例在未进行正压通气的情况下成功复苏,治疗组之间未观察到差异。所有孕周23周的婴儿无论治疗组如何均需在产房插管,而孕周27周的21例婴儿中只有3例(14%)需要此类插管。对于在产房未插管的婴儿,按照方案,36例婴儿(16例CPAP组婴儿和20例对照组婴儿)在第7天前在NICU随后插管。总体而言,80%的研究婴儿在出生后的前7天内需要插管。55例CPAP组婴儿中有52例(95%)、49例对照组婴儿中有43例(88%)接受的护理符合研究方案,总体依从率为91%。
本研究表明,与不接受CPAP/PEEP相比,婴儿可以成功随机接受产房CPAP/PEEP干预,仅在有复苏指征时插管,并根据预先指定的标准进行后续插管。孕周<28周的婴儿中有45%(104例中的47例)在产房因复苏需要插管。产房使用CPAP/PEEP不影响出生时或随后一周内的插管需求。总体而言,20%的婴儿在出生7天时不需要插管。这一经验应有助于促进后续针对ELBW婴儿通气支持的前瞻性研究的设计。