Michal Matthias, Sann Uli, Niebecker Markus, Lazanowsky Claudia, Kernhof Karin, Aurich Stephanie, Overbeck Gerd, Sierra Mauricio, Berrios German E
Klinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie des Klinikums der J.-W.-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main.
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2004 Sep-Oct;54(9-10):367-74. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-828296.
Self-rating scales have proved to be essential in the study of depersonalisation, which regrettably, is still seldom recognised in clinical practice. In recent studies the Cambridge Depersonalisation Scale (CDS) has emerged as an useful instrument for the study of depersonalisation. Here we report a validation study of the authorised German version of the CDS in a sample of 91 inpatients, 43 of whom had pathological depersonalisation and 48 without pathological depersonalisation. The SCID-D Interview for depersonalisation and derealisation was used as the gold standard and the German version of the Dissociative Experiences Scale was used to test the external validity of the scale. The German version of the CDS was found to have high internal consistency and reliability (alpha = 0,95 and Guttman Split-half = 0,95) and could differentiate patients with pathological depersonalisation from the control group. We therefore conclude that the German version of the CDS can be considered as reliable and valid.
自评量表已被证明在人格解体研究中至关重要,遗憾的是,人格解体在临床实践中仍很少得到认可。在最近的研究中,剑桥人格解体量表(CDS)已成为研究人格解体的一种有用工具。在此,我们报告了对91名住院患者样本中CDS授权德文版的验证研究,其中43人有人格解体病理症状,48人无人格解体病理症状。用于人格解体和现实解体的SCID-D访谈被用作金标准,解离体验量表德文版被用于测试该量表的外部效度。发现CDS德文版具有较高的内部一致性和信度(α = 0.95,古特曼折半系数 = 0.95),并且能够将有人格解体病理症状的患者与对照组区分开来。因此,我们得出结论,CDS德文版可被视为可靠且有效的。