Suppr超能文献

用于诊断妊娠期糖尿病的2小时与3小时100克葡萄糖耐量试验

A 2 hour versus the 3 hour 100 g glucose tolerance test for diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus.

作者信息

Jakobi Peter, Solt Ido, Weissman Amir

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

J Perinat Med. 2004;32(4):320-2. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2004.059.

Abstract

AIM

To determine how the omission of the third hour glucose measurement of the 100 g oral glucose tolerance test (GTT) affects the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 876 women delivered in a tertiary care hospital in Israel during a three-year period, who underwent a 100 g 3 hour oral GTT following an abnormal 50 g glucose screen. GDM was diagnosed according to the "criterion standard" accepted in the Fourth International Workshop Conference on GDM. The results of the 100 g 3 hour oral GTT were then retrospectively re-evaluated by omission of the third hour plasma glucose measurement from the "criterion standard".

RESULTS

GDM was diagnosed in 28.4% of the study. patients, while the omission of the third hour glucose measurement resulted in a 26.4% diagnosis of GDM. The perinatal data of the 18-omitted cases suggests that their exclusion from the GDM group would not have altered substantially the perinatal outcome of the study cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

A 100 g 2 hour oral GTT is a simple and economic alternative to the 100 g 3 hour oral GTT.

摘要

目的

确定在100克口服葡萄糖耐量试验(GTT)中省略第三小时血糖测量如何影响妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的诊断。

方法

回顾性查阅以色列一家三级护理医院在三年期间分娩的876名妇女的病历,这些妇女在50克葡萄糖筛查异常后接受了100克3小时口服GTT。根据第四届国际GDM研讨会会议接受的“标准标准”诊断GDM。然后通过从“标准标准”中省略第三小时血浆葡萄糖测量值,对100克3小时口服GTT的结果进行回顾性重新评估。

结果

28.4%的研究患者被诊断为GDM,而省略第三小时血糖测量导致26.4%的患者被诊断为GDM。18例被省略病例的围产期数据表明,将他们排除在GDM组之外不会实质性改变研究队列的围产期结局。

结论

100克2小时口服GTT是100克3小时口服GTT的一种简单且经济的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验