Berkus M D, Langer O
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.
Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Mar;85(3):423-7. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(94)00410-F.
To test the hypothesis that glucose abnormality, as shown by glucose tolerance test (GTT) periodicity, is not affected by different glucose loads, allowing for the identification of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) under varying glucose challenges.
Eighty subjects were tested by multiple GTTs 1 week apart. Each woman served as her own control, undergoing a standard 3-hour, 100-g GTT; then, half of the subject group randomly underwent a 50-g and the other half a 75-g, 2-hour GTT. Subjects were classified using National Diabetes Data Group thresholds for the 100-g GTT. Those with two or more abnormal values were classified as gestational diabetic (GDM group); the rest of the women were considered to be nondiabetic. The projected time for the GTT to revert to fasting value, GTT periodicity, was then determined for each glucose load in the GDM and nondiabetic groups.
All glucose values for the nondiabetic group were significantly lower at 1 and 2 hours than those for the GDM group, regardless of the glucose load (P < .04). There was a statistically significant difference within the GDM and nondiabetic groups between glucose values of the 100- and 50-g GTTs at 1 hour (P < .02) and between all loads at 2 hours (P < .04). The GTT periodicity for the 3-hour, 100-g test was significantly longer for patients with GDM, as shown previously (5.6 +/- 1.9 versus 3.2 +/- 1.7 hours, P < .0001). In addition, similar values were found for nondiabetic and GDM subjects for the 75-g (5.1 +/- 2 versus 3.6 +/- 1.8 hours, P < .04), but not the 50-g load (2.2 +/- .6 versus 1.34 +/- .8 hours, P < .01).
Glucose tolerance test periodicity will identify subjects with GDM regardless of GTT load because the physiologic disturbance of glucose level measured by this time period remains comparably longer than in normal subjects. We speculate that the relatively shorter cycle of the 50-g load may reflect an insufficient challenge to pancreatic function.
检验以下假设,即葡萄糖耐量试验(GTT)周期性所显示的葡萄糖异常不受不同葡萄糖负荷的影响,从而能够在不同葡萄糖挑战下识别妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)。
80名受试者每隔1周接受多次GTT检测。每位女性作为自身对照,先进行标准的3小时100克GTT检测;然后,受试者组的一半随机接受50克、另一半接受75克2小时GTT检测。使用国家糖尿病数据组针对100克GTT的阈值对受试者进行分类。有两个或更多异常值的受试者被分类为妊娠期糖尿病患者(GDM组);其余女性被视为非糖尿病患者。然后确定GDM组和非糖尿病组中每种葡萄糖负荷下GTT恢复到空腹值的预计时间,即GTT周期性。
无论葡萄糖负荷如何,非糖尿病组在1小时和2小时的所有葡萄糖值均显著低于GDM组(P < 0.04)。GDM组和非糖尿病组中,100克GTT与50克GTT在1小时的葡萄糖值之间(P < 0.02)以及所有负荷在2小时的葡萄糖值之间(P < 0.04)存在统计学显著差异。如先前所示,GDM患者的3小时100克检测的GTT周期性明显更长(5.6 +/- 1.9对3.2 +/- 1.7小时,P < 0.0001)。此外,75克负荷时非糖尿病和GDM受试者的结果相似(5.1 +/- 2对3.6 +/- 1.8小时,P < 0.04),但50克负荷时并非如此(2.2 +/- 0.6对1.34 +/- 0.8小时,P < 0.01)。
葡萄糖耐量试验周期性将识别出患有GDM 的受试者,无论GTT负荷如何,因为该时间段测量的葡萄糖水平的生理紊乱持续时间仍比正常受试者长得多。我们推测50克负荷相对较短的周期可能反映了对胰腺功能的刺激不足。