Harvey Ken J, Faunce Thomas A, Lokuge Buddhima, Drahos Peter
School of Public Health, La Trobe University, Plenty Road, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia.
Med J Aust. 2004 Sep 6;181(5):256-9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb06264.x.
The Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA) contains major concessions to the US pharmaceutical industry that may undermine the egalitarian principles and operation of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) and substantially increase the costs of medicinal drugs to Australian consumers. AUSFTA's approach to the PBS excessively emphasises the need to reward manufacturers of "innovative" new pharmaceuticals, instead of emphasising consumers' need for equitable and affordable access to necessary medicines (the first principle of our National Medicines Policy). Several features of AUSFTA may bring pressure to bear on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) to list "innovative" drugs that the committee initially rejected because the evidence for cost-effectiveness was not compelling. Intellectual property provisions of AUSFTA are likely to delay the entry of PBS cost-reducing generic products when pharmaceutical patents expire. We support the many concerned health and consumer organisations who have asked the Senate either not to pass the enabling legislation, or to delay its passage until a fairer deal in terms of public health can be obtained.
《澳美自由贸易协定》(AUSFTA)对美国制药行业做出了重大让步,这可能会破坏澳大利亚药品福利计划(PBS)的平等原则和运作,并大幅增加澳大利亚消费者的药品成本。AUSFTA对PBS的处理方式过度强调奖励“创新”新药制造商的必要性,而不是强调消费者公平且负担得起地获取必要药品的需求(这是我们国家药品政策的首要原则)。AUSFTA的几个特点可能会给药品福利咨询委员会(PBAC)带来压力,使其将一些起初因成本效益证据不足而被该委员会拒绝列入的“创新”药物列入清单。当药品专利到期时,AUSFTA的知识产权条款可能会推迟PBS降低成本的仿制药进入市场。我们支持许多相关的健康和消费者组织,它们要求参议院要么不通过授权立法,要么推迟通过,直到能在公共卫生方面达成更公平的协议。