Pirotte Benoit, Goldman Serge, Massager Nicolas, David Philippe, Wikler David, Lipszyc Maurice, Salmon Isabelle, Brotchi Jacques, Levivier Marc
Department of Neurosurgery, PET/Biomedical Cyclotron Unit, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
J Neurosurg. 2004 Sep;101(3):476-83. doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.3.0476.
The aim of this study was to compare the contribution of the tracers 11C-methionine (Met) and 18F-fluorodeoxy-glucose (FDG) in positron emission tomography (PET)-guided stereotactic brain biopsy.
Forty-five patients underwent combined Met-PET and FDG-PET studies associated with computerized tomography (CT)- or magnetic resonance (MR)-guided stereotactic biopsy. Each patient presented with a lesion that was in proximity to the cortical or subcortical gray matter. The Met-PET and FDG-PET scans were analyzed to determine which tracer offers the best information to guide at least one stereotactic biopsy trajectory. Histologically based diagnoses were rendered in all patients (39 tumors, six nontumorous lesions) and biopsies were performed in all tumors with the aid of PET guidance. When tumor FDG uptake was higher than that in the gray matter (18 tumors), FDG was used for target definition. When FDG uptake was absent or equivalent to that in the gray matter (21 tumors), Met was used for target definition. Parallel review of all histological and imaging data showed that all tumors had an area of abnormal Met uptake and 33 had abnormal FDG uptake. All six nontumorous lesions had no Met uptake and biopsies were performed using CT or MR guidance only. All tumor trajectories had an area of abnormal Met uptake; all nondiagnostic trajectories in tumors had no abnormal Met uptake.
When FDG shows limitations in target selection, Met is a good alternative because of its high specificity in tumors. Moreover, in the context of a single-tracer procedure and regardless of FDG uptake, Met is a better choice for PET guidance in neurosurgical procedures.
本研究旨在比较示踪剂11C-蛋氨酸(Met)和18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)在正电子发射断层扫描(PET)引导下的立体定向脑活检中的作用。
45例患者接受了Met-PET和FDG-PET联合检查,并与计算机断层扫描(CT)或磁共振(MR)引导下的立体定向活检相关联。每位患者均有一个靠近皮质或皮质下灰质的病变。对Met-PET和FDG-PET扫描进行分析,以确定哪种示踪剂能提供最佳信息来指导至少一条立体定向活检轨迹。所有患者(39例肿瘤,6例非肿瘤性病变)均做出了基于组织学的诊断,并在PET引导下对所有肿瘤进行了活检。当肿瘤FDG摄取高于灰质摄取时(18例肿瘤),使用FDG进行靶点定位。当FDG摄取缺失或与灰质摄取相当时(21例肿瘤),使用Met进行靶点定位。对所有组织学和影像学数据的平行回顾显示,所有肿瘤均有Met摄取异常区域,33例有FDG摄取异常。所有6例非肿瘤性病变均无Met摄取,仅使用CT或MR引导进行活检。所有肿瘤轨迹均有Met摄取异常区域;肿瘤中所有未明确诊断的轨迹均无Met摄取异常。
当FDG在靶点选择上存在局限性时,Met因其在肿瘤中的高特异性是一个很好的替代选择。此外,在单示踪剂程序的情况下,无论FDG摄取情况如何,Met在神经外科手术的PET引导中都是更好的选择。