Gerstenfeld Edward P, Callans David J, Dixit Sanjay, Russo Andrea M, Nayak Hemal, Lin David, Pulliam Ward, Siddique Sultan, Marchlinski Francis E
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 9 Founders Pavilion, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Circulation. 2004 Sep 14;110(11):1351-7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000141369.50476.D3. Epub 2004 Sep 7.
A proarrhythmic consequence of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation can be a recurrent organized left atrial (LA) tachycardia after ablation. This arrhythmia is frequently referred to as "left atrial flutter," but the mechanism and best ablation strategy have not been determined.
Isolation of arrhythmogenic PVs was initially performed by segmental ostial PV ablation guided by a circular mapping catheter in 341 patients. Patients whose predominant recurrent arrhythmia was a persistent organized tachycardia returned for mapping and ablation. Recurrent organized LA tachycardias (cycle length 253+/-33 ms, range 213 to 328 ms) occurred in 10 (2.9%) of 341 patients (age 59+/-9 years, 1 woman). Mapping was consistent with a focal origin in 8 patients and with macroreentry in 1 patient and was unclear in 1 patient owing to degeneration to atrial fibrillation. Focal tachycardias originated from reconnected segments of prior isolated PVs (6 patients), the posterior LA (1 patient), or the superior septum (1 patient). Focal atrial tachycardias were ablated with point lesions that targeted the earliest activation. All reconnected PVs were also reisolated. Reentrant LA flutter occurred around the left PVs in 1 patient. After 6.7+/-2.3 months of follow-up, 9 (90%) of 10 patients were arrhythmia free (4 of whom were taking antiarrhythmic drug therapy), and one was having recurrent atrial fibrillation.
Recurrent organized LA tachycardia after PV isolation is uncommon and typically has a focal origin from reconnected PV ostia. Reisolation of the PV and ablation of non-PV foci are sufficient to treat this proarrhythmia. Linear lesions are only required when a macroreentrant mechanism is present.
肺静脉(PV)隔离的一个促心律失常后果可能是消融术后反复发作的有组织的左心房(LA)心动过速。这种心律失常常被称为“左心房扑动”,但其机制和最佳消融策略尚未确定。
最初在341例患者中,通过环形标测导管引导下的节段性肺静脉口部消融来隔离致心律失常的肺静脉。主要复发性心律失常为持续性有组织性心动过速的患者返回进行标测和消融。341例患者中有10例(2.9%)发生了复发性有组织的左心房心动过速(周长253±33毫秒,范围213至328毫秒)(年龄59±9岁,1名女性)。8例患者的标测结果与局灶性起源一致,1例与大折返一致,1例因退化为心房颤动而不清楚。局灶性心动过速起源于先前隔离的肺静脉的重新连接节段(6例)、左心房后部(1例)或上间隔(1例)。局灶性房性心动过速通过针对最早激动的点状消融进行治疗。所有重新连接的肺静脉也重新进行了隔离。1例患者发生围绕左肺静脉的折返性左心房扑动。经过6.7±2.3个月的随访,10例患者中有9例(90%)无心律失常(其中4例正在接受抗心律失常药物治疗),1例有复发性心房颤动。
肺静脉隔离术后复发性有组织的左心房心动过速并不常见,通常起源于重新连接的肺静脉口部的局灶。重新隔离肺静脉和消融非肺静脉灶足以治疗这种促心律失常。仅在存在大折返机制时才需要线性消融。