Ammenwerth Elske, de Keizer Nicolette
UMIT-University for Health Informatics and Technology Tyrol, Research Group Assessment of Health Information Systems, Innsbruck, Austria.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 2):1289-94.
During the last years the significance of evaluation studies as well as the interest in adequate methods and approaches for evaluation has grown in medical informatics. In order to put this discussion into the historical context of evaluation research, we conducted a systematic overview on trends in evaluation research of information technology in health care 1982-2002. The inventory is based on a systematic literature search in PubMed. Each of the found 1.035 papers from 1982-2002 was indexed based on a taxonomy coding type of information system, clinical domain, research strategy, evaluation methods, setting and evaluation aspects. We found interesting developments in evaluation research in the last 20 years. For example, their has been a strong shift from medical journals to medical informatics journals. With regard to methods, explanative research and quantitative methods have dominated evaluation studies in the last 20 years. From 1982 to today, the number of lab studies and technical evaluation aspects has declined, while studies focusing on process quality or outcome quality of patient care have increased. Based on our results, we are inclined to talk of a kind of maturation of evaluation studies in medical informatics research.
在过去几年中,评估研究的重要性以及对适当评估方法和途径的兴趣在医学信息学领域不断增长。为了将这一讨论置于评估研究的历史背景中,我们对1982年至2002年医疗保健领域信息技术评估研究的趋势进行了系统综述。该清单基于在PubMed上进行的系统文献检索。从1982年至2002年找到的1035篇论文中的每一篇都根据信息系统类型、临床领域、研究策略、评估方法、环境和评估方面的分类编码进行了索引。我们发现过去20年评估研究中有一些有趣的发展。例如,研究重点已从医学期刊强烈转向医学信息学期刊。在方法方面,解释性研究和定量方法在过去20年的评估研究中占主导地位。从1982年到现在,实验室研究和技术评估方面的数量有所下降,而关注患者护理过程质量或结果质量的研究有所增加。基于我们的研究结果,我们倾向于认为医学信息学研究中的评估研究已趋于成熟。