Suppr超能文献

信息技术评估研究的效果与质量:1982 - 2002年的趋势

The effects and quality of IT evaluation studies: Trends in 1982 - 2002.

作者信息

de Keizer Nicolette, Ammenwerth Elske

机构信息

Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, Universiteit van Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:186-90.

Abstract

During the last years the significance of evaluation studies as well as the interest in adequate methods and approaches for evaluation has grown in medical informatics. In order to put this discussion into historical perspective of evaluation research, we conducted a systematic review on trends in evaluation research of information technology in health care from 1982 to 2002. In a first step of our inventory, we concentrated on describing long-term developments e.g. in study questions and methods used of IT evaluation studies as described in the abstracts of the identified 1.035 publications. In the second step of our inventory, we now analysed 64 randomly selected full papers on evaluation studies, in order to answer two questions: Did IT evaluation studies show a positive effect of IT on quality of processes or outcome quality of patient care, and how did the quality of evaluation studies themselves develop in the last 20 years. Appropriateness of the care process was the most common and mostly positively evaluated aspect. There was a trend towards more multi-centre studies. The quality of the studies remained stable over time. Randomized controlled trials had significantly higher quality than non-RCT studies.

摘要

在过去几年中,评估研究的重要性以及对适当评估方法和途径的关注度在医学信息学领域不断提高。为了将这一讨论置于评估研究的历史背景下,我们对1982年至2002年期间医疗保健领域信息技术评估研究的趋势进行了系统综述。在清查的第一步中,我们专注于描述长期发展情况,例如在所识别的1035篇出版物摘要中所述的信息技术评估研究的研究问题和所用方法。在清查的第二步中,我们现在分析了64篇随机挑选的关于评估研究的全文,以回答两个问题:信息技术评估研究是否表明信息技术对护理过程质量或患者护理结果质量有积极影响,以及评估研究本身的质量在过去20年中是如何发展的。护理过程的适当性是最常见且大多得到积极评价的方面。多中心研究有增加的趋势。研究质量随时间保持稳定。随机对照试验的质量明显高于非随机对照试验研究。

相似文献

2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Sertindole for schizophrenia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
5
Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 16;6(6):CD011841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011841.pub3.
6
Structured treatment interruptions (STI) in chronic unsuppressed HIV infection in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD006148. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006148.
8
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
10
E-Health interventions for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with long-term physical conditions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 15;8(8):CD012489. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012489.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
The ethical challenges of personalized digital health.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jun 19;10:1123863. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1123863. eCollection 2023.
2
Informatics systems to promote improved care for chronic illness: a literature review.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Mar-Apr;14(2):156-63. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2255. Epub 2007 Jan 9.

本文引用的文献

4
Outcomes and methods in telemedicine evaluation.
Telemed J E Health. 2003 Winter;9(4):393-401. doi: 10.1089/153056203772744734.
5
Developing and evaluating criteria to help reviewers of biomedical informatics manuscripts.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Sep-Oct;10(5):512-4. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1062. Epub 2003 Jun 4.
6
The effects of promoting patient access to medical records: a review.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Mar-Apr;10(2):129-38. doi: 10.1197/jamia.m1147.
8
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Apr 17;134(8):657-62. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00011.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验