de Keizer Nicolette, Ammenwerth Elske
Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, Universiteit van Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:186-90.
During the last years the significance of evaluation studies as well as the interest in adequate methods and approaches for evaluation has grown in medical informatics. In order to put this discussion into historical perspective of evaluation research, we conducted a systematic review on trends in evaluation research of information technology in health care from 1982 to 2002. In a first step of our inventory, we concentrated on describing long-term developments e.g. in study questions and methods used of IT evaluation studies as described in the abstracts of the identified 1.035 publications. In the second step of our inventory, we now analysed 64 randomly selected full papers on evaluation studies, in order to answer two questions: Did IT evaluation studies show a positive effect of IT on quality of processes or outcome quality of patient care, and how did the quality of evaluation studies themselves develop in the last 20 years. Appropriateness of the care process was the most common and mostly positively evaluated aspect. There was a trend towards more multi-centre studies. The quality of the studies remained stable over time. Randomized controlled trials had significantly higher quality than non-RCT studies.
在过去几年中,评估研究的重要性以及对适当评估方法和途径的关注度在医学信息学领域不断提高。为了将这一讨论置于评估研究的历史背景下,我们对1982年至2002年期间医疗保健领域信息技术评估研究的趋势进行了系统综述。在清查的第一步中,我们专注于描述长期发展情况,例如在所识别的1035篇出版物摘要中所述的信息技术评估研究的研究问题和所用方法。在清查的第二步中,我们现在分析了64篇随机挑选的关于评估研究的全文,以回答两个问题:信息技术评估研究是否表明信息技术对护理过程质量或患者护理结果质量有积极影响,以及评估研究本身的质量在过去20年中是如何发展的。护理过程的适当性是最常见且大多得到积极评价的方面。多中心研究有增加的趋势。研究质量随时间保持稳定。随机对照试验的质量明显高于非随机对照试验研究。