Inceoglu Serkan, Ferrara Lisa, McLain Robert F
Spine Research Laboratory, The Cleveland Clinic Spine Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Spine J. 2004 Sep-Oct;4(5):513-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.02.006.
Researchers studying early pedicle screw designs have suggested that pullout strength and insertional torque are correlated. For surgeons using pedicle screws, insertional torque is widely believed to be a good predictor of pullout strength and initial stability of the screw and construct. How appropriate is this assumption when applied to new screw and thread designs?
This study investigated the correlation between insertional torque and pullout strength of three different pedicle screw designs, with different insertional torque characteristics. We hypothesized that a significant increase in insertional torque would indicate a commensurate increase in pullout strength.
Biomechanical analysis of instrumented vertebral specimens.
Calf lumbar vertebra were prepared and instrumented with one of three pedicle screws. Pilot hole preparation was standardized and coaxial orientation was confirmed by direct inspection. Screws did not penetrate the pedicle cortex or abut or penetrate the anterior vertebral cortex. Any specimen with pedicle wall breach was discarded. The pedicles were instrumented with one of three screws: 1) 7.5 x 40 mm conical, asymmetric progressive thread (Xia; Stryker Spine, Allendale, NJ), 2) 7.5 x 40 mm conical with traditional V-shaped thread (Osteonics, Stryker Spine, Allendale, NJ)) or 3) 6.5 x 40 mm cylindrical with V thread (Osteonics, cylindrical). Paired testing allowed individual screws to be directly compared with a contralateral "control." Insertional torque and peak torque values were recorded for each rotation up to full insertion. Pullout testing was conducted at a rate of 1 mm/minute. Load-displacement data were recorded at 20 Hz. Stiffness was considered the slope of the most linear part of the curve before the yield point.
Peak loads for 7.5 conical Xia screws measured 1,783+/-589.1 N compared with 1,943.0+/-625.8 N for 7.5 conical Osteonics screws and 1,641.0+/-356.7 N for 6.5 cylindrical Osteonics screws. The peak insertional torque values were 6.7+/-1.9 Nm (158% greater than control), 4.5+/-1.1 Nm (73% greater than control) and 2.6+/-0.7 Nm, respectively. Insertional torques for Xia screws were significantly greater than conical (p=.001) and cylindrical Osteonics screws (p<.0001), and insertional torques for Osteonics conical screws were significantly greater than those of cylindrical screws (p<.0001). Although pullout loads for the conical Osteonics screws were consistently higher than either the Xia or Osteonics cylindrical screws, the differences were not significant (p>.05). There was no significant correlation between pullout strength and insertional torque (p>.05).
This unexpected result is best explained by the progressively narrowing flutes of the Xia screw, which compact the trabeculae into a smaller volume as the screw nears full insertion. The trapezoidal threads also increase contact with the cortical surface area and compress trabeculae toward the cortex, thus creating greater friction and higher torque values. This increase in torque did not translate into a commensurate increase in pullout strength, where trabeculae fail in shear.
研究早期椎弓根螺钉设计的研究人员表明,拔出强度与插入扭矩相关。对于使用椎弓根螺钉的外科医生来说,普遍认为插入扭矩是螺钉及结构拔出强度和初始稳定性的良好预测指标。当应用于新的螺钉和螺纹设计时,这一假设的适用性如何?
本研究调查了三种具有不同插入扭矩特性的不同椎弓根螺钉设计的插入扭矩与拔出强度之间的相关性。我们假设插入扭矩的显著增加将表明拔出强度相应增加。
对植入器械的椎体标本进行生物力学分析。
制备小牛腰椎并植入三种椎弓根螺钉之一。导向孔制备标准化,并通过直接检查确认同轴方向。螺钉未穿透椎弓根皮质,也未抵靠或穿透椎体前皮质。任何有椎弓根壁破裂的标本均被丢弃。椎弓根植入以下三种螺钉之一:1)7.5×40 mm锥形、不对称渐进螺纹(Xia;史赛克脊柱,新泽西州阿伦代尔),2)7.5×40 mm传统V形螺纹锥形(奥施康定,史赛克脊柱,新泽西州阿伦代尔)或3)6.5×40 mm V形螺纹圆柱形(奥施康定,圆柱形)。配对测试允许将单个螺钉与对侧“对照”直接比较。记录每次旋转直至完全插入时的插入扭矩和峰值扭矩值。以1毫米/分钟的速度进行拔出测试。以20赫兹记录载荷-位移数据。刚度被视为屈服点之前曲线最线性部分的斜率。
7.5锥形Xia螺钉的峰值载荷为1783±589.1牛,而7.5锥形奥施康定螺钉为1943.0±625.8牛,6.5圆柱形奥施康定螺钉为1641.0±356.7牛。峰值插入扭矩值分别为6.7±1.9牛米(比对照高158%)、4.5±1.1牛米(比对照高73%)和2.6±0.7牛米。Xia螺钉的插入扭矩显著高于锥形(p = 0.001)和圆柱形奥施康定螺钉(p < 0.0001),奥施康定锥形螺钉的插入扭矩显著高于圆柱形螺钉(p < 0.0001)。尽管奥施康定锥形螺钉的拔出载荷始终高于Xia或奥施康定圆柱形螺钉,但差异不显著(p > 0.05)。拔出强度与插入扭矩之间无显著相关性(p > 0.05)。
这一意外结果的最佳解释是Xia螺钉的凹槽逐渐变窄,随着螺钉接近完全插入,将小梁压实到更小的体积中。梯形螺纹也增加了与皮质表面积的接触,并将小梁向皮质压缩,从而产生更大的摩擦力和更高的扭矩值。扭矩的这种增加并未转化为拔出强度的相应增加,因为小梁在剪切中失效。