Suppr超能文献

俯卧位下经内镜辅助的胸腰椎前后路同时重建术。

The endoscopically assisted simultaneous posteroanterior reconstruction of the thoracolumbar spine in prone position.

作者信息

Verheyden Akhil P, Hoelzl Alexander, Lill Helmut, Katscher Sebastian, Glasmacher Stefan, Josten Christoph

机构信息

University of Leipzig, Clinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Liebigstrasse 20a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Spine J. 2004 Sep-Oct;4(5):540-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.01.018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The reconstruction of the anterior column of the thoracolumbar spine has become more common in the last few years, due largely to the unfavorable results of exclusively posterior surgical treatment, which has been associated with a lack of about 10 degrees of kyphosis correction after removal of the instrumentation. The minimally invasive anterior techniques have reduced the morbidity of the anterior approach significantly.

PURPOSE

A minimally invasive technique for anterior stabilization of the spine may reduce the morbidity of the open approach. Irrespective of an anterior open or an endoscopic approach, the posteroanterior instrumentation of thoracolumbar fractures requires time-consuming intraoperative maneuvers to change the patient position from prone to lateral. We describe here a standardized anterior endoscopically assisted approach for the segments T4 to L4. This approach allows the patient to remain in prone position. A 4- to 5-cm incision combined with a retractor system is used.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: In a prospective study, all patients of our clinic who underwent surgery of the thoracolumbar spine between July 1999 and May 2001 were registered. Study criteria were duration of surgery, duration of anesthesia, intra- and postoperative complications.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Between July 1999 and May 2001, 42 patients (25 male, 17 female, average age of 41.9 years), who presented with 55 injured spinal levels and underwent surgery of the thoracolumbar spine in prone position, were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Duration of surgery (posterior/anterior/total), duration of anesthesia, method of instrumentation, intra- and postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay and radiographs were evaluated.

METHODS

Surgery was performed in prone position. A thoracic approach was used for instrumentation of T9 to L2. A retroperitoneal approach was used for stabilization of L1 to L5. Both procedures were endoscopically assisted with a new retractor system (Synframe; Synthes GmbH, Umkirch, Germany). In this manner, only an incision 4 to 5 cm long and a stab incision for the endoscope were required. The whole procedure was performed in prone position without a change of position during surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients underwent surgery following this technique: 14 isolated anterior procedures (median duration of surgery, 181 minutes); 13 simultaneous one-stage procedures (median duration of surgery: 210 minutes) and 15 combined two-stage procedures (median duration of surgery: 90 minutes posterior, 120 minutes anterior, 240 minutes posterior+anterior). In the simultaneous posteroanterior procedures, the anterior instrumentation was performed 20 times using one rod, twice using two rods and in six patients simply by bone grafting. No intraoperative complications were observed. In the postoperative course, one case of pneumothorax, one case of hemothorax and one case of transient intercostal neuralgia occurred.

CONCLUSION

The approach to the anterior spine in prone position is feasible by using a self-holding retractor system for the region between T4 and L4. The duration of anesthesia for the one-stage simultaneous procedure was reduced by about 40 minutes, because changing the position of the patient is no longer necessary. The minimal incision, in combination with the retractor system, significantly reduces cost by allowing the use of less expensive instruments and implants. The advantages of the open and the endoscopic techniques are combined, while their disadvantages are minimized. The main advantage of the prone position is the opportunity to access the anterior and posterior spine simultaneously, which is especially helpful in reduction maneuvers.

摘要

背景

近年来,胸腰椎前路重建术越来越普遍,这主要是因为单纯后路手术治疗效果不佳,在取出内固定后,后凸畸形矫正不足约10度。微创前路技术显著降低了前路手术的发病率。

目的

一种用于脊柱前路稳定的微创技术可能会降低开放手术的发病率。无论采用前路开放手术还是内镜手术,胸腰椎骨折的前后路内固定都需要在术中花费大量时间将患者体位从俯卧位改为侧卧位。我们在此描述一种用于T4至L4节段的标准化前路内镜辅助手术方法。该方法可使患者保持俯卧位。采用一个4至5厘米的切口并结合牵开器系统。

研究设计/地点:在一项前瞻性研究中,对1999年7月至2001年5月期间在我们诊所接受胸腰椎手术的所有患者进行了登记。研究标准包括手术时间、麻醉时间以及术中及术后并发症。

患者样本

1999年7月至2001年5月期间,纳入了42例患者(25例男性,17例女性,平均年龄41.9岁),这些患者共有55个脊柱损伤节段,均在俯卧位下接受了胸腰椎手术。

观察指标

评估手术时间(后路/前路/总时间)、麻醉时间、内固定方法、术中及术后并发症、术后住院时间和影像学检查结果。

方法

手术在俯卧位下进行。T9至L2节段的内固定采用经胸入路。L1至L5节段的稳定采用腹膜后入路。两种手术均在内镜辅助下使用一种新型牵开器系统(Synframe;德国乌尔克的Synthes GmbH公司)。通过这种方式,仅需一个4至5厘米长的切口和一个用于内镜的戳孔切口。整个手术过程均在俯卧位下进行,术中无需改变体位。

结果

共有42例患者采用该技术进行了手术:14例单纯前路手术(手术中位时间为181分钟);13例一期同时手术(手术中位时间:210分钟);15例二期联合手术(手术中位时间:后路90分钟,前路120分钟,后路+前路240分钟)。在一期前后路联合手术中,前路内固定采用单根棒的情况有20次,采用两根棒的情况有2次,6例患者仅行植骨。未观察到术中并发症。在术后过程中,发生了1例气胸、1例血胸和1例短暂性肋间神经痛。

结论

通过使用用于T4至L4区域的自固定牵开器系统,在俯卧位下行前路脊柱手术是可行的。一期同时手术的麻醉时间减少了约40分钟,因为无需再改变患者体位。最小切口与牵开器系统相结合,通过允许使用较便宜的器械和植入物,显著降低了成本。开放手术和内镜手术的优点得以结合,而缺点则被最小化。俯卧位的主要优点是有机会同时进入脊柱的前后路,这在复位操作中特别有帮助。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验