• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为购买者制定医疗服务价格——方法与经验综述

Pricing health services for purchasers--a review of methods and experiences.

作者信息

Waters Hugh R, Hussey Peter

机构信息

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Room 8132, 615 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2004 Nov;70(2):175-84. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.04.012.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.04.012
PMID:15364147
Abstract

This article reviews methodologies and international experience related to costing and pricing health services for health care purchasers. The main factors affecting price-setting methods are: (1) provider payment systems; (2) information available on actual costs, service volumes and outcomes; and (3) characteristics of providers and purchasers. These factors are strongly interrelated. Provider payment systems determine the unit of services to be priced. In order to minimize incentives for under- or over-utilization, the prices that purchasers pay for health care services should be related to the actual unit costs of services, but accurately calculating real unit costs is intensive in terms of resources and information. Pertinent provider characteristics influencing price-setting include provider autonomy, provider negotiating power, and the degree of competition. The article presents a series of examples that run through each of these three sets of factors. The examples are from Denmark, the UK, and Thailand (for capitation); Australia, Hungary, and the United States (for case-based payment); and Germany, Korea, and Taiwan (for fee-for-service payment mechanisms). From these experiences, the article concludes with appropriate lessons for low- and middle-income countries, where the principal constraint on the development of provider payments systems is the limited availability of information on costs, volumes, and patient characteristics.

摘要

本文回顾了与医疗保健购买者的医疗服务成本核算和定价相关的方法及国际经验。影响定价方法的主要因素有:(1)提供者支付系统;(2)关于实际成本、服务量和结果的可用信息;(3)提供者和购买者的特征。这些因素紧密相关。提供者支付系统决定了要定价的服务单位。为了尽量减少过度使用或使用不足的诱因,购买者支付的医疗服务价格应与服务的实际单位成本相关,但准确计算实际单位成本在资源和信息方面要求很高。影响定价的相关提供者特征包括提供者自主权、提供者谈判能力和竞争程度。本文给出了一系列贯穿这三组因素的例子。这些例子分别来自丹麦、英国和泰国(按人头付费);澳大利亚、匈牙利和美国(按病例付费);以及德国、韩国和台湾地区(按服务项目付费机制)。从这些经验中,本文为低收入和中等收入国家总结了适当的经验教训,在这些国家,提供者支付系统发展的主要制约因素是成本、服务量和患者特征方面信息的有限可得性。

相似文献

1
Pricing health services for purchasers--a review of methods and experiences.为购买者制定医疗服务价格——方法与经验综述
Health Policy. 2004 Nov;70(2):175-84. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.04.012.
2
New payment model for rural health services in Mongolia.蒙古农村医疗卫生服务的新支付模式。
Rural Remote Health. 2006 Jan-Mar;6(1):434. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
3
Risk-based capitation payments for health care: a survey of the literature.基于风险的医疗保健按人头付费:文献综述
J Health Adm Educ. 1987 Fall;5(4):571-93.
4
Application of activity-based costing (ABC) for a Peruvian NGO healthcare provider.作业成本法(ABC)在秘鲁一家非政府组织医疗服务提供商中的应用。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2001 Jan-Mar;16(1):3-18. doi: 10.1002/hpm.606.
5
Establishing a capitation policy for mental health and substance abuse services in healthcare reform.在医疗改革中制定心理健康和药物滥用服务的按人头付费政策。
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1994 Jul-Aug;3(4):36-9.
6
Quality-based purchasing in health care.医疗保健领域基于质量的采购。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2004 Oct-Dec;19(4):365-81. doi: 10.1002/hpm.768.
7
Marketing environment dynamics and implications for pricing strategies: the case of home health care.营销环境动态及其对定价策略的影响:以家庭医疗保健为例。
J Hosp Mark. 1999;13(1):13-41. doi: 10.1300/J043v13n01_02.
8
Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.医疗保险计划;医院 inpatient 预期支付系统及 2007 财年费率的变更;2007 财年工资指数的职业构成调整;医疗保健基础设施改善计划;参与癌症相关医疗保健的合格医院贷款计划的选择标准及债务免除;以及在计算平均销售价格(ASP)时排除根据 B 部分门诊药品和生物制品的竞争性采购计划(CAP)进行的供应商采购。最终规则及有意见征求期的暂行最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2006 Aug 18;71(160):47869-8351.
9
An analysis of the effects of organization and financing on the utilization and costs of public mental health services in san diego county.圣地亚哥县公共心理健康服务的组织与融资对服务利用及成本的影响分析。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2007 Sep;10(3):123-32.
10
The use of ambulatory patient groups for regulation of hospital ambulatory surgery revenue in Maryland.在马里兰州使用门诊患者分组来规范医院门诊手术收入。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2008 Jan-Mar;31(1):17-23. doi: 10.1097/01.JAC.0000304092.28711.e2.

引用本文的文献

1
Framework for responsive financing of district hospitals of India.印度地区医院响应式融资框架。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 16;12:1398227. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1398227. eCollection 2024.
2
A comprehensive value-based method for new nuclear medical service pricing: with case study of radium [223] bone metastases treatment.一种全面的基于价值的核医学新服务定价方法:以镭[223]骨转移治疗为例。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 29;24(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10777-8.
3
Cost of delivering primary healthcare services through public sector in India.
印度通过公共部门提供初级医疗保健服务的成本。
Indian J Med Res. 2022 Sep;156(3):372-380. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_67_19.
4
The effect of the capitation policy withdrawal on maternal health service provision in Ashanti Region, Ghana: an interrupted time series analysis.加纳阿散蒂地区人头付费政策取消对孕产妇保健服务提供的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2022 Oct 21;7(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s41256-022-00271-1.
5
Unit costs for non-acute care in Ireland 2016-2019.2016 - 2019年爱尔兰非急性护理的单位成本。
HRB Open Res. 2021 Apr 23;4:39. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13256.1. eCollection 2021.
6
Setting health care services tariffs in Iran: half a century quest for a window of opportunity.伊朗医疗服务定价:半个世纪寻求机会之窗。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Jul 6;19(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01224-1.
7
Budget impact analysis of lens material on the posterior capsule opacification (PCO) as a complication after the cataract surgery.晶状体材料对白内障手术后并发症后囊膜混浊(PCO)的预算影响分析。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Jun 16;18:19. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00214-y. eCollection 2020.
8
Cost of Delivering Secondary Healthcare Through the Public Sector in India.印度通过公共部门提供二级医疗保健的成本。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2020 Jun;4(2):249-261. doi: 10.1007/s41669-019-00176-9.
9
Comparison of Real Cost Versus the Indonesian Case Base Groups (INA-CBGs) Tariff Rates Among Patients of High- Incidence Cancers Under the National Health Insurance Scheme.国家健康保险计划下高发性癌症患者实际费用与印度尼西亚病例库组(INA-CBGs)费率的比较
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Jan 25;20(1):117-122. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.1.117.
10
Global budgets in Maryland: early evidence on revenues, expenses, and margins in regulated and unregulated services.马里兰州的全球预算:关于受监管和不受监管服务的收入、支出及利润的早期证据。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2018 Dec;18(4):395-408. doi: 10.1007/s10754-018-9239-y. Epub 2018 Apr 2.