Suppr超能文献

与常规糖蛋白IIb/IIIa受体阻滞剂联合肝素相比,氯吡格雷预处理对临时糖蛋白IIb/IIIa受体阻滞剂联合比伐卢定相对疗效的影响:REPLACE-2研究的一项子研究

Lack of clopidogrel pretreatment effect on the relative efficacy of bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared to heparin with routine glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade: a REPLACE-2 substudy.

作者信息

Saw Jacqueline, Lincoff A Michael, DeSmet Walter, Betriu Amadeo, Rutsch Wolfgang, Wilcox Robert G, Kleiman Neil S, Wolski Kathy, Topol Eric J

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Sep 15;44(6):1194-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.049.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess if clopidogrel pretreatment affects the relative efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin with glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blockade for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).

BACKGROUND

Although thienopyridine pretreatment may improve clinical outcomes with PCI, it is unknown if bivalirudin's efficacy compared with heparin is dependent upon such pretreatment.

METHODS

The Randomized Evaluation in Percutaneous coronary intervention Linking Angiomax to reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE-2) trial was a double-blind, triple-dummy, randomized-controlled trial comparing heparin plus routine GP IIb/IIIa blockade (heparin group) with bivalirudin plus provisional GP IIb/IIIa blockade (bivalirudin group) during PCI. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), urgent revascularization at 30 days, and major in-hospital bleeding. The secondary end point was a 30-day composite of death, MI, and urgent revascularization. Clopidogrel pretreatment was encouraged (300 mg loading, 75 mg/day).

RESULTS

Of 6,010 patients enrolled, 5,893 received clopidogrel, with 85.8% in the bivalirudin and 84.6% in the heparin group receiving clopidogrel pretreatment. Bivalirudin (provisional GP IIb/IIIa blockade 7.2%) was noninferior to the heparin group for both primary and secondary end points. Clopidogrel pretreatment did not affect the relative efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin with GP IIb/IIIa blockade, irrespective of pretreatment duration. Pretreatment was associated with significantly lower primary end point with bivalirudin (8.7% pretreatment vs. 12.9% no pretreatment, p = 0.007), and nonsignificantly with heparin (9.7% vs. 11.7%, respectively, p = 0.20). Multivariable models showed a trend toward lower primary and secondary end points with clopidogrel pretreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Clopidogrel pretreatment at the doses and time administered in this trial did not influence the relative efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa blockade for PCI. However, pretreatment was associated with a trend towards lower clinical events after PCI.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估氯吡格雷预处理是否会影响比伐卢定与肝素联合糖蛋白(GP)IIb/IIIa受体拮抗剂在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中的相对疗效。

背景

尽管噻吩吡啶类药物预处理可能改善PCI的临床结局,但比伐卢定与肝素相比的疗效是否依赖于这种预处理尚不清楚。

方法

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中连接Angiomax与降低临床事件的随机评估(REPLACE-2)试验是一项双盲、三模拟、随机对照试验,比较PCI期间肝素加常规GP IIb/IIIa受体拮抗剂(肝素组)与比伐卢定加临时GP IIb/IIIa受体拮抗剂(比伐卢定组)。主要终点是30天内死亡、心肌梗死(MI)、紧急血运重建和院内大出血的复合终点。次要终点是30天内死亡、MI和紧急血运重建的复合终点。鼓励进行氯吡格雷预处理(负荷剂量300 mg,每日75 mg)。

结果

在纳入的6010例患者中,5893例接受了氯吡格雷治疗,比伐卢定组和肝素组分别有85.8%和84.6%的患者接受了氯吡格雷预处理。比伐卢定组(临时GP IIb/IIIa受体拮抗剂使用率7.2%)在主要终点和次要终点方面均不劣于肝素组。氯吡格雷预处理不影响比伐卢定与肝素联合GP IIb/IIIa受体拮抗剂的相对疗效,与预处理持续时间无关。预处理与比伐卢定组显著较低的主要终点相关(预处理组为8.7%,未预处理组为12.9%,p = 0.007),与肝素组无显著相关性(分别为9.7%和11.7%,p = 0.20)。多变量模型显示,氯吡格雷预处理有降低主要终点和次要终点的趋势。

结论

本试验中给予的剂量和时间的氯吡格雷预处理不影响比伐卢定与肝素联合GP IIb/IIIa受体拮抗剂在PCI中的相对疗效。然而,预处理与PCI后临床事件减少的趋势相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验