Greenberg Division of Cardiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York 10021, USA.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Oct 1;76(4):513-24. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22546.
This study sought to investigate if the efficacy of bivalirudin monotherapy is similar to heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibition in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) treated with clopidogrel following diagnostic angiography.
Prior trials have demonstrated that peri-procedural bivalirudin therapy confers similar efficacy as heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, while lowering the risk of bleeding complications in ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). However, the incidence of adverse ischemic events post-PCI appeared to be higher in patients receiving bivalirudin without adequate pretreatment with clopidogrel.
Using the 2004/2005 Cornell Angioplasty Registry, we evaluated 980 consecutive patients undergoing urgent PCI for UA/NSTEMI who were treated with either bivalirudin or UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. We excluded patients who were on chronic clopidogrel therapy or received clopidogrel pretreatment prior to angiography. All patients received a clopidogrel load (≥300-mg dose) immediately before or after the PCI. Long-term all-cause mortality was obtained for 100% of patients, with a mean follow-up of 24.6 ± 7.7 months.
Of the 980 study patients, 461 (47.0%) were treated with bivalirudin and 519 (53.0%) patients received UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. DES were used in 88% of PCI; 45% of patients presented with NSTEMI. The incidence of in-hospital death (0.4% vs. 0.2%, P = 0.604), post-procedural MI (6.9% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.351), and MACE including death, stroke, emergent CABG/PCI, and MI (7.6% vs. 5.8%, P = 0.304) were similar in patients treated with bivalirudin versus UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, respectively. The incidence of in-hospital stent thrombosis was similar (0.7% vs. 0%, P = 0.104), while major (0.9% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.034) and minor bleeding (10.4% vs. 18.9%, P < 0.001) was reduced in the bivalirudin-treated group. By two-years of follow-up, after propensity-score adjusted multivariate Cox regression analysis, there was no significant difference in long-term mortality between the two groups (HR 1.18; 95%CI 0.64-2.19, P = 0.598).
In patients presenting with ACS and receiving clopidogrel treatment after angiography (before or within 30 min of PCI), peri-procedural bivalirudin monotherapy suppresses acute and long-term adverse events to a similar extent as does UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, while significantly lowering the risk of bleeding complications.
本研究旨在探讨在接受诊断性血管造影后接受氯吡格雷治疗的急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者中,比伐卢定单药治疗的疗效是否与肝素加 GP IIb/IIIa 抑制剂相似。
先前的试验表明,围手术期比伐卢定治疗可提供与肝素加 GP IIb/IIIa 抑制剂相似的疗效,同时降低接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 ACS 患者出血并发症的风险。然而,在接受比伐卢定治疗而未充分进行氯吡格雷预处理的患者中,PCI 后不良缺血事件的发生率似乎更高。
使用 2004/2005 年康奈尔血管成形术注册中心,我们评估了 980 例因 UA/NSTEMI 而行紧急 PCI 的连续患者,他们接受了比伐卢定或 UFH 加 GP IIb/IIIa 抑制剂治疗。我们排除了正在接受慢性氯吡格雷治疗或在血管造影前接受氯吡格雷预处理的患者。所有患者在 PCI 前或后立即接受氯吡格雷负荷量(≥300mg 剂量)。对 100%的患者进行了长期全因死亡率的随访,平均随访时间为 24.6±7.7 个月。
在 980 例研究患者中,461 例(47.0%)接受比伐卢定治疗,519 例(53.0%)接受 UFH 加 GP IIb/IIIa 抑制剂治疗。88%的 PCI 使用了 DES;45%的患者出现 NSTEMI。住院期间死亡率(0.4% vs. 0.2%,P=0.604)、术后 MI(6.9% vs. 5.4%,P=0.351)和包括死亡、卒中和紧急 CABG/PCI 以及 MI 在内的 MACE(7.6% vs. 5.8%,P=0.304)在接受比伐卢定和 UFH 加 GP IIb/IIIa 抑制剂治疗的患者中相似。住院期间支架血栓形成的发生率相似(0.7% vs. 0%,P=0.104),而大出血(0.9% vs. 2.9%,P=0.034)和小出血(10.4% vs. 18.9%,P<0.001)在比伐卢定治疗组中减少。经过倾向评分调整后的多变量 Cox 回归分析,两组在 2 年随访时的长期死亡率无显著差异(HR 1.18;95%CI 0.64-2.19,P=0.598)。
在接受血管造影检查并在接受氯吡格雷治疗(血管造影前或 PCI 后 30 分钟内)后出现 ACS 的患者中,围手术期比伐卢定单药治疗可抑制急性和长期不良事件,与 UFH 加 GP IIb/IIIa 抑制剂相似,同时显著降低出血并发症的风险。