Pugh Perdita L, Ahmed Sharlin F, Smith Martin I, Upton Neil, Hunter A Jacqueline
Neurology and GI CEDD, GlaxoSmithKline, Third Avenue, Harlow, Essex CM19 5AW, UK.
Behav Brain Res. 2004 Dec 6;155(2):283-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.04.021.
The use of transgenic models in scientific research has made an enormous contribution to our understanding of the causes and symptoms of many diseases, including neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and Parkinson's Disease (PD). In the creation of transgenic models of neurodegenerative disease, effects of the background strain of the animal on the resulting genotype must be taken into consideration. This is particularly true for behavioural studies in which the background strain of the mouse may mask the phenotype of the genetic manipulation. Here, the behaviour of two mouse strains used in transgenic models, FVB/N and C57BL6/J, were compared. Studies of circadian wheel activity, cognition and aggression revealed considerable phenotypic differences between strains. These data also indicate that the FVB/N strain is not appropriate as a background strain in the behavioural assessment of transgenic mouse models.
转基因模型在科学研究中的应用为我们理解许多疾病的病因和症状做出了巨大贡献,这些疾病包括神经退行性疾病,如阿尔茨海默病(AD)和帕金森病(PD)。在创建神经退行性疾病的转基因模型时,必须考虑动物背景品系对所得基因型的影响。在行为研究中尤其如此,因为小鼠的背景品系可能会掩盖基因操作的表型。在此,对转基因模型中使用的两种小鼠品系FVB/N和C57BL6/J的行为进行了比较。对昼夜节律转轮活动、认知和攻击性的研究揭示了品系之间存在相当大的表型差异。这些数据还表明,FVB/N品系不适宜作为转基因小鼠模型行为评估的背景品系。