Bax Jeroen J, Schinkel Arend F L, Boersma Eric, Elhendy Abdou, Rizzello Vittoria, Maat Alexander, Roelandt Jos R T C, van der Wall Ernst E, Poldermans Don
Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Circulation. 2004 Sep 14;110(11 Suppl 1):II18-22. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138195.33452.b0.
Extensive left ventricular (LV) remodeling may not allow functional recovery after revascularization, despite the presence of viable myocardium.
Seventy-nine consecutive patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (left ventricle ejection fraction [LVEF] 29+/-7%) underwent surgical revascularization. Before revascularization, viability was assessed by metabolic imaging with F18-fluorodeoxyglucose and SPECT. LV volumes and LVEF were assessed by resting echocardiography. LVEF was re-assessed by echocardiography 8 to 12 months after revascularization. Three-year clinical follow-up (events: cardiac death, infarction, and hospitalization for heart failure) was also obtained. Forty-nine patients had substantial viability; 5 died before re-assessment of LVEF. Of the remaining 44 patients, 24 improved > or =5% in LVEF after revascularization, whereas 20 did not improve in LVEF. LV end-systolic volume was the only parameter that was significantly different between the groups (109+/-46 mL for the improvers versus 141+/-31 mL for the nonimprovers; P<0.05). The change in LVEF after revascularization was linearly related to the baseline LV end-systolic volume, with a higher LV end-systolic volume associated with a low likelihood of improvement in LVEF after revascularization. During the 3-year follow-up, the highest event-rate (67%) was observed in patients without viable myocardium with a large LV size, whereas the lowest event rate (5%) was observed in patients with viable myocardium and a small LV size. Intermediate event rates were observed in patients with viable myocardium and a large LV size (38%), and in patients without viable myocardium and a small LV size (24%).
Extensive LV remodeling prohibits improvement in LVEF after revascularization and affects long-term prognosis negatively, despite the presence of viability.
尽管存在存活心肌,但广泛的左心室(LV)重构可能不允许血管重建后功能恢复。
79例连续的缺血性心肌病患者(左心室射血分数[LVEF]29±7%)接受了外科血管重建术。在血管重建术前,通过F18-氟脱氧葡萄糖代谢成像和单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)评估存活心肌。通过静息超声心动图评估左心室容积和LVEF。血管重建术后8至12个月通过超声心动图重新评估LVEF。还获得了三年的临床随访结果(事件:心源性死亡、心肌梗死和因心力衰竭住院)。49例患者有大量存活心肌;5例在重新评估LVEF前死亡。在其余44例患者中,24例血管重建术后LVEF改善≥5%,而20例LVEF未改善。左心室收缩末期容积是两组之间唯一有显著差异的参数(改善组为109±46 mL,未改善组为141±31 mL;P<0.05)。血管重建术后LVEF的变化与基线左心室收缩末期容积呈线性相关,左心室收缩末期容积越高,血管重建术后LVEF改善的可能性越低。在三年随访期间,左心室大且无存活心肌的患者事件发生率最高(67%),而左心室小且有存活心肌的患者事件发生率最低(5%)。左心室大且有存活心肌的患者(38%)以及左心室小且无存活心肌的患者(24%)观察到中等事件发生率。
尽管存在存活心肌,但广泛的左心室重构会阻碍血管重建术后LVEF的改善,并对长期预后产生负面影响。