García-Ferreiro Rafael E, Kerschensteiner Daniel, Major Felix, Monje Francisco, Stühmer Walter, Pardo Luis A
Abteilung Molekulare Biologie Neuronaler Signale, Max-Planck Institut für Experimentelle Medizin, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
J Gen Physiol. 2004 Oct;124(4):301-17. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200409041. Epub 2004 Sep 13.
Ether à go-go (Eag; KV10.1) voltage-gated K+ channels have been detected in cancer cell lines of diverse origin and shown to influence their rate of proliferation. The tricyclic antidepressant imipramine and the antihistamine astemizole inhibit the current through Eag1 channels and reduce the proliferation of cancer cells. Here we describe the mechanism by which both drugs block human Eag1 (hEag1) channels. Even if both drugs differ in their affinity for hEag1 channels (IC50s are approximately 2 microM for imipramine and approximately 200 nM for astemizole) and in their blocking kinetics, both drugs permeate the membrane and inhibit the hEag1 current by selectively binding to open channels. Furthermore, both drugs are weak bases and the IC50s depend on both internal an external pH, suggesting that both substances cross the membrane in their uncharged form and act from inside the cell in their charged forms. Accordingly, the block by imipramine is voltage dependent and antagonized by intracellular TEA, consistent with imipramine binding in its charged form to a site located close to the inner end of the selectivity filter. Using inside- and outside-out patch recordings, we found that a permanently charged, quaternary derivative of imipramine (N-methyl-imipramine) only blocks channels from the intracellular side of the membrane. In contrast, the block by astemizole is voltage independent. However, as astemizole competes with imipramine and intracellular TEA for binding to the channel, it is proposed to interact with an overlapping intracellular binding site. The significance of these findings, in the context of structure-function of channels of the eag family is discussed.
超极化激活环核苷酸门控阳离子通道(Eag;KV10.1)电压门控钾通道已在多种来源的癌细胞系中被检测到,并显示会影响其增殖速率。三环抗抑郁药丙咪嗪和抗组胺药阿司咪唑可抑制通过Eag1通道的电流,并降低癌细胞的增殖。在此,我们描述了这两种药物阻断人Eag1(hEag1)通道的机制。尽管这两种药物对hEag1通道的亲和力不同(丙咪嗪的半数抑制浓度约为2 microM,阿司咪唑约为200 nM),且阻断动力学也不同,但它们都能透过细胞膜,并通过选择性结合开放通道来抑制hEag1电流。此外,这两种药物都是弱碱,半数抑制浓度取决于细胞内和细胞外的pH值,这表明这两种物质均以不带电荷的形式穿过细胞膜,并以带电荷的形式在细胞内发挥作用。因此,丙咪嗪的阻断作用具有电压依赖性,并被细胞内的四乙铵所拮抗,这与丙咪嗪以带电荷的形式结合在靠近选择性过滤器内端的位点一致。使用内面向外和外面向内的膜片钳记录,我们发现丙咪嗪的一种永久带电荷的季铵衍生物(N - 甲基丙咪嗪)仅从细胞膜的细胞内侧阻断通道。相比之下,阿司咪唑的阻断作用不具有电压依赖性。然而,由于阿司咪唑与丙咪嗪和细胞内的四乙铵竞争结合通道,因此推测它与一个重叠的细胞内结合位点相互作用。我们还讨论了这些发现对于eag家族通道结构 - 功能的意义。