Murchie Peter, Campbell Neil C, Ritchie Lewis D, Deans H George, Thain Joan
Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill Health Centre, Westburn Road, Aberdeen AB25 2AY.
Fam Pract. 2004 Oct;21(5):567-74. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh514.
The long-term effects of disease management programmes for coronary heart disease on health status are unknown. In a randomized trial of nurse-led secondary prevention clinics, we found significantly improved health status at 1 year. Participants were followed-up again at 4 years to determine if improvements had been sustained.
Our aim was to evaluate the effects on health of nurse-led clinics for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care.
A total of 1343 patients with coronary heart disease were randomized to nurse-led secondary prevention clinics or usual care, with follow-up at 1 and 4 years by review of medical case notes and national data sets, and postal questionnaires. The study involved a stratified, random sample of 19 general practices in north-east Scotland. Health status was measured by the SF-36 questionnaire, chest pain by the angina TyPE specification and anxiety and depression by the hospital anxiety and depression scale.
At 1 year, there were significant improvements in five of eight SF-36 domains (all functioning scales, pain and general health) in patients randomized to clinics. Role limitations attributed to physical problems improved the most [adjusted difference 8.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.16-12.9]. At 4 years, the intervention group scored higher than control in all domains, but differences were no longer significant. At 1 year, fewer patients in the intervention group reported worsening chest pain (odds ratio 0.59, 95% C1 0.37-0.94). At 4 years, there were no significant differences between the proportion of intervention or control group patients who reported chest pain in the last week or who reported worsening chest pain. No significant effects were observed on anxiety or depression at 1 or 4 years.
We have demonstrated previously a significantly greater survival in attendees at nurse-led secondary prevention clinics. Despite this, improvements in health status achieved in the first year of the study were reduced at 4 years. The case for nurse-led clinics remains strong, but further research is required on ways to optimize current health status.
冠心病疾病管理项目对健康状况的长期影响尚不清楚。在一项由护士主导的二级预防诊所的随机试验中,我们发现1年时健康状况有显著改善。4年后对参与者再次进行随访,以确定改善效果是否得以持续。
我们的目的是评估在初级保健中由护士主导的冠心病二级预防诊所对健康的影响。
总共1343例冠心病患者被随机分配到由护士主导的二级预防诊所或常规护理组,通过查阅病历和国家数据集以及邮寄问卷的方式在1年和4年时进行随访。该研究涉及苏格兰东北部19家普通诊所的分层随机样本。健康状况通过SF-36问卷进行测量,胸痛通过心绞痛类型规范进行评估,焦虑和抑郁通过医院焦虑和抑郁量表进行评估。
在1年时,随机分配到诊所的患者在SF-36的八个领域中的五个领域(所有功能量表、疼痛和总体健康)有显著改善。因身体问题导致的角色限制改善最为明显[调整差异8.52,95%置信区间(CI)4.16 - 12.9]。在4年时,干预组在所有领域的得分均高于对照组,但差异不再显著。在1年时,干预组中报告胸痛加重的患者较少(比值比0.59,95%CI 0.37 - 0.94)。在4年时,干预组或对照组中在过去一周报告胸痛或报告胸痛加重的患者比例之间没有显著差异。在1年和4年时,未观察到对焦虑或抑郁有显著影响。
我们之前已经证明,参加由护士主导的二级预防诊所的患者生存率显著更高。尽管如此,研究第一年所实现的健康状况改善在4年时有所下降。由护士主导的诊所的理由仍然充分,但需要进一步研究优化当前健康状况的方法。