Massimi Azzurra, De Vito Corrado, Brufola Ilaria, Corsaro Alice, Marzuillo Carolina, Migliara Giuseppe, Rega Maria Luisa, Ricciardi Walter, Villari Paolo, Damiani Gianfranco
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
School of Nursing, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 10;12(3):e0173617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173617. eCollection 2017.
The expansion of primary care and community-based service delivery systems is intended to meet emerging needs, reduce the costs of hospital-based ambulatory care and prevent avoidable hospital use by the provision of more appropriate care. Great emphasis has been placed on the role of self-management in the complex process of care of patient with long-term conditions. Several studies have determined that nurses, among the health professionals, are more recommended to promote health and deliver preventive programs within the primary care context. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of the nurse-led self-management support versus usual care evaluating patient outcomes in chronic care community programs. Systematic review was carried out in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science including RCTs of nurse-led self-management support interventions performed to improve observer reported outcomes (OROs) and patients reported outcomes (PROs), with any method of communication exchange or education in a community setting on patients >18 years of age with a diagnosis of chronic diseases or multi-morbidity. Of the 7,279 papers initially retrieved, 29 met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses on systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure reduction (10 studies-3,881 patients) and HbA1c reduction (7 studies-2,669 patients) were carried-out. The pooled MD were: SBP -3.04 (95% CI -5.01--1.06), DBP -1.42 (95% CI -1.42--0.49) and HbA1c -0.15 (95% CI -0.32-0.01) in favor of the experimental groups. Meta-analyses of subgroups showed, among others, a statistically significant effect if the interventions were delivered to patients with diabetes (SBP) or CVD (DBP), if the nurses were specifically trained, if the studies had a sample size higher than 200 patients and if the allocation concealment was not clearly defined. Effects on other OROs and PROs as well as quality of life remain inconclusive.
扩大初级保健和基于社区的服务提供系统旨在满足新出现的需求,降低医院门诊护理成本,并通过提供更适当的护理来避免不必要的住院治疗。自我管理在慢性病患者复杂的护理过程中的作用受到了高度重视。多项研究表明,在卫生专业人员中,护士更适合在初级保健环境中促进健康和开展预防项目。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估在慢性护理社区项目中,由护士主导的自我管理支持与常规护理相比,对患者结局的疗效。在MEDLINE、CINAHL、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中进行了系统评价,纳入了针对18岁以上诊断为慢性病或多种疾病的患者,在社区环境中采用任何沟通交流或教育方法进行的由护士主导的自我管理支持干预的随机对照试验,以改善观察者报告结局(ORO)和患者报告结局(PRO)。在最初检索到的7279篇论文中,29篇符合纳入标准。对收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)降低(10项研究 - 3881例患者)以及糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)降低(7项研究 - 2669例患者)进行了荟萃分析。合并后的平均差为:SBP -3.04(95%置信区间 -5.01--1.06),DBP -1.42(95%置信区间 -1.42--0.49),HbA1c -0.15(95%置信区间 -0.32-0.01),支持试验组。亚组荟萃分析表明,除其他外,如果干预措施针对糖尿病患者(SBP)或心血管疾病患者(DBP)、护士经过专门培训、研究样本量大于200例患者以及分配隐藏未明确界定,则具有统计学显著效果。对其他ORO和PRO以及生活质量的影响仍无定论。