Suppr超能文献

用于研究的组织库中的伦理问题:制定国际标准的前景与陷阱。

Ethical issues in tissue banking for research: the prospects and pitfalls of setting international standards.

作者信息

Maschke Karen J, Murray Thomas H

机构信息

The Hastings Center, Garrison, NY 10524, USA.

出版信息

Theor Med Bioeth. 2004;25(2):143-55. doi: 10.1023/b:meta.0000033773.44765.7c.

Abstract

Bauer, Taub, and Parsi's review of an international sample of standards on informed consent, confidentiality, commercialization, and quality of research in tissue banking reveals that no clear national or international consensus exists for these issues. The authors' response to the lack of uniformity in the meaning, scope, and ethical significance of the policies they examined is to call for the creation of uniform ethical guidelines. This raises questions about whether harmonization should consist of voluntary international standards or international regulations that include an official oversight mechanism and sanctions for noncompliance, and about who should participate in the harmonization process. Moreover, the normative assumptions and political dynamics that shape global policymaking need to be addressed. This commentary explores the policy implications and normative questions raised by the idea of international ethical guidelines for the use of biotechnologies and biotechnological resources such as stored samples of human tissue.

摘要

鲍尔、陶布和帕尔西对国际上有关知情同意、保密、商业化以及组织库研究质量等标准样本进行的综述表明,在这些问题上不存在明确的国家或国际共识。作者们针对他们所研究政策在含义、范围及伦理意义方面缺乏一致性的情况,呼吁制定统一的伦理准则。这引发了一些问题,即协调统一应采用自愿性国际标准,还是包含官方监督机制及对违规行为进行制裁的国际法规,以及谁应参与协调统一过程。此外,还需探讨塑造全球政策制定的规范性假设和政治动态。本评论探讨了针对生物技术及生物科技资源(如储存的人体组织样本)使用的国际伦理准则这一理念所引发的政策影响和规范性问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验