Maschke Karen J, Murray Thomas H
The Hastings Center, Garrison, NY 10524, USA.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2004;25(2):143-55. doi: 10.1023/b:meta.0000033773.44765.7c.
Bauer, Taub, and Parsi's review of an international sample of standards on informed consent, confidentiality, commercialization, and quality of research in tissue banking reveals that no clear national or international consensus exists for these issues. The authors' response to the lack of uniformity in the meaning, scope, and ethical significance of the policies they examined is to call for the creation of uniform ethical guidelines. This raises questions about whether harmonization should consist of voluntary international standards or international regulations that include an official oversight mechanism and sanctions for noncompliance, and about who should participate in the harmonization process. Moreover, the normative assumptions and political dynamics that shape global policymaking need to be addressed. This commentary explores the policy implications and normative questions raised by the idea of international ethical guidelines for the use of biotechnologies and biotechnological resources such as stored samples of human tissue.
鲍尔、陶布和帕尔西对国际上有关知情同意、保密、商业化以及组织库研究质量等标准样本进行的综述表明,在这些问题上不存在明确的国家或国际共识。作者们针对他们所研究政策在含义、范围及伦理意义方面缺乏一致性的情况,呼吁制定统一的伦理准则。这引发了一些问题,即协调统一应采用自愿性国际标准,还是包含官方监督机制及对违规行为进行制裁的国际法规,以及谁应参与协调统一过程。此外,还需探讨塑造全球政策制定的规范性假设和政治动态。本评论探讨了针对生物技术及生物科技资源(如储存的人体组织样本)使用的国际伦理准则这一理念所引发的政策影响和规范性问题。