Sekimoto Miho, Imanaka Yuichi, Evans Edward, Ishizaki Tatsuro, Hirose Masahiro, Hayashida Kenshi, Fukui Tsuguya
Department of Healthcare Economics and Quality Management, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Konoe-cho, Yoshida, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Oct;16(5):367-73. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh066.
Under the fee-for-service system, the overuse and misuse of perioperative antibiotics have become serious concerns in Japan. The objective of the present study is to investigate practice variations of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis between and within hospitals, and to identify any opportunities for improvement.
We polled 319 surgeons in six specialties employed by 11 teaching hospitals in Japan. We developed questionnaires with vignettes, asking physicians about their practice of antimicrobial prophylaxis in six surgical procedures (gastrectomy, hysterectomy, cataract surgery, clipping of cerebral aneurysm, hip fracture surgery, and coronary artery bypass graft) and utilization of institutional clinical pathways.
Average durations of prophylaxis varied by procedure, from 1.6 days for cataract surgery to 5.8 days for clipping surgery. Variation was also observed between institutions for the same procedure, e.g. institutional averages for the duration of prophylaxis for gastrectomy ranged from 2.3 to 7 days. Large intra-institutional variation in prophylaxis duration and inconsistent use of clinical pathways were observed in the cases of gastrectomy, hip fracture surgery, and clipping surgery. At one hospital, 20% of physicians performing gastrectomy indicated the use of an institutional clinical pathway, and prophylaxis duration ranged from 3 to 6 days. For cataract surgery and hysterectomy, clinical pathways were universally applied and intra-institutional practice variation was small, yet prophylaxis duration varied widely between hospitals and third-generation cephalosporins were used extensively. Average length of prophylaxis for hysterectomy ranged from 1.8 to 6 days and 43% of respondents prescribed third-generation cephalosporins.
In Japan, perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis lacks standardization. Efforts to strengthen an evidence-based approach to antimicrobial prophylaxis need to be made a priority at both the national and institutional levels.
在按服务收费体系下,围手术期抗生素的过度使用和滥用在日本已成为严重问题。本研究的目的是调查医院之间以及医院内部围手术期抗菌药物预防的实践差异,并确定任何改进机会。
我们对日本11家教学医院聘用的6个专科的319名外科医生进行了调查。我们编制了带有病例 vignettes 的问卷,询问医生他们在六种外科手术(胃切除术、子宫切除术、白内障手术、脑动脉瘤夹闭术、髋部骨折手术和冠状动脉搭桥术)中抗菌药物预防的实践情况以及机构临床路径的使用情况。
预防的平均持续时间因手术而异,白内障手术为1.6天,夹闭手术为5.8天。同一手术在不同机构之间也存在差异,例如胃切除术预防持续时间的机构平均值在2.3至7天之间。在胃切除术、髋部骨折手术和夹闭手术病例中,观察到预防持续时间在机构内部存在较大差异以及临床路径使用不一致。在一家医院,进行胃切除术的医生中有20%表示使用了机构临床路径,预防持续时间为3至6天。对于白内障手术和子宫切除术,临床路径得到普遍应用,机构内部实践差异较小,但医院之间预防持续时间差异很大,并且第三代头孢菌素被广泛使用。子宫切除术的平均预防长度在1.8至6天之间,43%的受访者开具了第三代头孢菌素。
在日本,围手术期抗菌药物预防缺乏标准化。在国家和机构层面,都需要优先努力加强基于证据的抗菌药物预防方法。